Oral Chemotherapy and Patient Perspective in Solid Tumors: A National Survey by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology. Issue 1 (January 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Oral Chemotherapy and Patient Perspective in Solid Tumors: A National Survey by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology. Issue 1 (January 2016)
- Main Title:
- Oral Chemotherapy and Patient Perspective in Solid Tumors: A National Survey by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology
- Authors:
- Aurilio, Gaetano
Gori, Stefania
Nolè, Franco
Pruneri, Giancarlo
Coati, Francesca
Torri, Valter
Lunardi, Gianluigi
Atzori, Francesco
La Verde, Nicla
Banna, Giuseppe Luigi
Rossi, Antonio
Del Mastro, Lucia
Di Fabio, Francesca
Marcon, Ilaria
Gebbia, Vittorio
Loupakis, Fotios
Orlando, Laura
Ciuffreda, Libero
Amadio, Placido
Luppi, Gabriele
Redana, Stefania
Filippelli, Gianfranco
Gentile, Annalisa
Collovà, Elena - Abstract:
- Aim: To assess patient perception toward oral chemotherapy for solid tumors, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology performed a large multi-institutional national survey. Methods: A 17-item anonymous questionnaire including 7 general and 10 investigational questions with free-text, single-choice, or multiple-choice answers was administered. Analysis of response distribution according to predefined factors was described by summary measures and conducted by χ 2 test and other nonparametric tests. Results: From January to June 2010, 581 patients completed the questionnaire; data of 404 patients constituted the final study sample. Three groups could be distinguished according to treatment: IV chemotherapy (IV group, n = 313), oral chemotherapy (oral group, n = 48), or combined therapy (combined group, n = 43). Thirty-one (72%) patients in the combined group and 187 (60%) in the IV group expressed preference for oral therapy (p = 0.028). Limitations in family and work commitment were more frequently perceived by patients on IV than oral chemotherapy (147 (47%) vs 14 (29%) patients, p<0.05, and 134 (43%) vs 11 (23%) patients, p<0.05). A total of 134 (43%) patients on IV chemotherapy versus 15 (31%) patients in the oral group did not point out any limitation for number of tablets per day (p = 0.004). Conclusions: We observed a propensity from the patient perspective in favor of oral chemotherapy that was considered to have a lower impact on family and work commitments than IVAim: To assess patient perception toward oral chemotherapy for solid tumors, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology performed a large multi-institutional national survey. Methods: A 17-item anonymous questionnaire including 7 general and 10 investigational questions with free-text, single-choice, or multiple-choice answers was administered. Analysis of response distribution according to predefined factors was described by summary measures and conducted by χ 2 test and other nonparametric tests. Results: From January to June 2010, 581 patients completed the questionnaire; data of 404 patients constituted the final study sample. Three groups could be distinguished according to treatment: IV chemotherapy (IV group, n = 313), oral chemotherapy (oral group, n = 48), or combined therapy (combined group, n = 43). Thirty-one (72%) patients in the combined group and 187 (60%) in the IV group expressed preference for oral therapy (p = 0.028). Limitations in family and work commitment were more frequently perceived by patients on IV than oral chemotherapy (147 (47%) vs 14 (29%) patients, p<0.05, and 134 (43%) vs 11 (23%) patients, p<0.05). A total of 134 (43%) patients on IV chemotherapy versus 15 (31%) patients in the oral group did not point out any limitation for number of tablets per day (p = 0.004). Conclusions: We observed a propensity from the patient perspective in favor of oral chemotherapy that was considered to have a lower impact on family and work commitments than IV chemotherapy. The treatment that patients were taking when the questionnaire was administered likely influenced their perception and related results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Tumori. Volume 102:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- Tumori
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0102-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 108
- Page End:
- 113
- Publication Date:
- 2016-01
- Subjects:
- IV chemotherapy -- Oral chemotherapy -- Patient perspective -- Questionnaire -- Treatment
Cancer -- Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1767840.html ↗
http://journals.sagepub.com/home/tmja ↗
http://www.tumorionline.it ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.5301/tj.5000383 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0300-8916
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8739.xml