Comparison of arterial spin labeling registration strategies in the multi‐center GENetic frontotemporal dementia initiative (GENFI). Issue 1 (8th May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of arterial spin labeling registration strategies in the multi‐center GENetic frontotemporal dementia initiative (GENFI). Issue 1 (8th May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of arterial spin labeling registration strategies in the multi‐center GENetic frontotemporal dementia initiative (GENFI)
- Authors:
- Mutsaerts, Henri J.M.M.
Petr, Jan
Thomas, David L.
De Vita, Enrico
Cash, David M.
van Osch, Matthias J.P.
Golay, Xavier
Groot, Paul F.C.
Ourselin, Sebastien
van Swieten, John
Laforce, Robert
Tagliavini, Fabrizio
Borroni, Barbara
Galimberti, Daniela
Rowe, James B.
Graff, Caroline
Pizzini, Francesca B.
Finger, Elizabeth
Sorbi, Sandro
Castelo Branco, Miguel
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
Masellis, Mario
MacIntosh, Bradley J. - Other Names:
- Rossor Martin investigator.
Fox Nick investigator.
Warren Jason investigator.
Bocchetta Martina investigator.
Dick Katrina investigator.
Pievani Michela investigator.
Ghidoni Roberta investigator.
Benussi Luisa investigator.
Padovani Alessandro investigator.
Cosseddu Maura investigator.
Mendonça Alexandre investigator.
Frisoni Giovanni investigator.
Premi Enrico investigator.
Archetti Silvana investigator.
Scarpini Elio investigator.
Fumagalli Giorgio investigator.
Arighi Andrea investigator.
Fenoglio Chiara investigator.
Prioni Sara investigator.
Redaelii Veronica investigator.
Grisoli Marina investigator.
Tiraboschi Pietro investigator.
Black Sandra investigator.
Rogaeva Ekaterina investigator.
Freedman Morris investigator.
Tartaglia Maria Carmela investigator.
Tang‐Wai David investigator.
Keren Ron investigator.
Panman Jessica investigator.
Meeter Lieke investigator.
Jiskoot Lize investigator.
van Minkelen Rick investigator.
Lombardi Gemma investigator.
Polito Cristina investigator.
Nacmias Benedetta investigator.
Jelic Vesna investigator.
Andersson Christin investigator.
Öijerstedt Linn investigator.
Fallström Marie investigator.
Thonberg Hakan investigator.
Verdelho Ana investigator.
Maruta Carolina investigator.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To compare registration strategies to align arterial spin labeling (ASL) with 3D T1‐weighted (T1w) images, with the goal of reducing the between‐subject variability of cerebral blood flow (CBF) images. Materials and Methods: Multi‐center 3T ASL data were collected at eight sites with four different sequences in the multi‐center GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) study. In a total of 48 healthy controls, we compared the following image registration options: (I) which images to use for registration (perfusion‐weighted images [PWI] to the segmented gray matter (GM) probability map (pGM) (CBF‐pGM) or M0 to T1w (M0‐T1w); (II) which transformation to use (rigid‐body or non‐rigid); and (III) whether to mask or not (no masking, M0‐based FMRIB software library Brain Extraction Tool [BET] masking). In addition to visual comparison, we quantified image similarity using the Pearson correlation coefficient (CC), and used the Mann‐Whitney U rank sum test. Results: CBF‐pGM outperformed M0‐T1w (CC improvement 47.2% ± 22.0%; P < 0.001), and the non‐rigid transformation outperformed rigid‐body (20.6% ± 5.3%; P < 0.001). Masking only improved the M0‐T1w rigid‐body registration (14.5% ± 15.5%; P = 0.007). Conclusion: The choice of image registration strategy impacts ASL group analyses. The non‐rigid transformation is promising but requires validation. CBF‐pGM rigid‐body registration without masking can be used as a default strategy. In patients with expansiveAbstract : Purpose: To compare registration strategies to align arterial spin labeling (ASL) with 3D T1‐weighted (T1w) images, with the goal of reducing the between‐subject variability of cerebral blood flow (CBF) images. Materials and Methods: Multi‐center 3T ASL data were collected at eight sites with four different sequences in the multi‐center GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) study. In a total of 48 healthy controls, we compared the following image registration options: (I) which images to use for registration (perfusion‐weighted images [PWI] to the segmented gray matter (GM) probability map (pGM) (CBF‐pGM) or M0 to T1w (M0‐T1w); (II) which transformation to use (rigid‐body or non‐rigid); and (III) whether to mask or not (no masking, M0‐based FMRIB software library Brain Extraction Tool [BET] masking). In addition to visual comparison, we quantified image similarity using the Pearson correlation coefficient (CC), and used the Mann‐Whitney U rank sum test. Results: CBF‐pGM outperformed M0‐T1w (CC improvement 47.2% ± 22.0%; P < 0.001), and the non‐rigid transformation outperformed rigid‐body (20.6% ± 5.3%; P < 0.001). Masking only improved the M0‐T1w rigid‐body registration (14.5% ± 15.5%; P = 0.007). Conclusion: The choice of image registration strategy impacts ASL group analyses. The non‐rigid transformation is promising but requires validation. CBF‐pGM rigid‐body registration without masking can be used as a default strategy. In patients with expansive perfusion deficits, M0‐T1w may outperform CBF‐pGM in sequences with high effective spatial resolution. BET‐masking only improves M0‐T1w registration when the M0 image has sufficient contrast. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:131–140. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 47:Issue 1(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 1(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0047-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 131
- Page End:
- 140
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05-08
- Subjects:
- arterial spin labeling -- cerebral blood flow -- image registration
Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jmri.25751 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1053-1807
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5010.791000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8732.xml