HaemoPREF: Further evaluation of patient perception and preference for treatment in a real world setting. Issue 6 (19th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bonanad, S.; Schulz, M.; Gordo, A.; Spurden, D.; Cicchetti, M.; Cappelleri, J. C.; Tolley, C.; Staunton, H.; Brohan, E.
• Is Part Of: Haemophilia. Volume 23:Issue 6(2017)
• Page Start: 884
• Page End: 893
• Publication Date: 2017-09-19
• Subjects: Haemophilia -- HaemoPREF -- Patient‐Reported Outcome -- Preference -- Ease of Use -- Treatment Satisfaction; Hemophilia -- Periodicals; 616.1572005
• DOI: 10.1111/hae.13321
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-8216

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Adherence to haemophilia A (HA) treatment may be influenced by patients' beliefs about their condition and treatment. Furthermore, difficulties administering treatment may lead to poor adherence. New treatment strategies aim to reduce the burden associated with administration and to improve patient perception of treatment, which, in turn, increase adherence levels. Aims: This study aimed to examine patient perception of HA treatment and related factors using patient‐reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and to confirm the psychometric properties of a recently developed questionnaire, the HaemoPREF. Methods: A non‐interventional, cross‐sectional, questionnaire study was conducted with adult HA patients in Spain (n=31), Germany (n=10) and Italy (n=48), who were using ReFacto AF with the FuseNGo administration device. Patients completed the HaemoPREF and other questionnaires measuring related constructs: treatment adherence, satisfaction and well‐being, online at two time points. Correlational, regression and psychometric analyses were conducted. Results: PRO scores indicated that patients are satisfied with and adherent to their treatment. Multivariate regression of the HaemoPREF global score identified a number of significant predictors ( P ≤.05). The HaemoPREF Global Score had a moderate relationship with subscales on the related questionnaires (mean correlation=0.43; range=0.39‐0.48). The HaemoPREF demonstrated good test‐retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.82), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha range=0.69‐0.82) and convergent validity with measures of treatment satisfaction (Spearman correlation coefficient, r =.48) and well‐being ( r =.41). Conclusion: The findings suggest that patients using ReFacto AF with FuseNGo were satisfied with and adherent to their treatment. The HaemoPREF can identify important concepts relating to patient treatment experience in HA.