Adaptive Designs for Non-inferiority Trials with Multiple Experimental Treatments. (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Wenfu; Hu, Feifang; Cheung, Siu Hung
• Is Part Of: Statistical methods in medical research. Volume 27:Number 11(2018)
• Page Start: 3255
• Page End: 3270
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: Adaptive treatment allocation -- multiple experimental treatments -- doubly adaptive biased coin design; Medicine -- Research -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Review Literature -- Periodicals; Statistics -- methods -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Recherche -- Méthodes statistiques -- Périodiques; 610.727
• DOI: 10.1177/0962280217695579
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-2802

Abstract

The increase in the popularity of non-inferiority clinical trials represents the increasing need to search for substitutes for some reference (standard) treatments. A new treatment would be preferred to the standard treatment if the benefits of adopting it outweigh a possible clinically insignificant reduction in treatment efficacy (non-inferiority margin). Statistical procedures have recently been developed for treatment comparisons in non-inferiority clinical trials that have multiple experimental (new) treatments. An ethical concern for non-inferiority trials is that some patients undergo the less effective treatments; this problem is more serious when multiple experimental treatments are included in a balanced trial in which the sample sizes are the same for all experimental treatments. With the aim of giving fewer patients the inferior treatments, we propose a response-adaptive treatment allocation scheme that is based on the doubly adaptive biased coin design. The proposed adaptive design is also shown to be superior to the balanced design in terms of testing power.