Interpreting Repeated Temperature‐Depth Profiles for Groundwater Flow. Issue 10 (27th October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bense, Victor F.; Kurylyk, Barret L.; van Daal, Jonathan; van der Ploeg, Martine J.; Carey, Sean K.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 53:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: 8639
• Page End: 8647
• Publication Date: 2017-10-27
• Subjects: heat flow -- climate warming -- groundwater flow; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1002/2017WR021496
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: Temperature can be used to trace groundwater flows due to thermal disturbances of subsurface advection. Prior hydrogeological studies that have used temperature‐depth profiles to estimate vertical groundwater fluxes have either ignored the influence of climate change by employing steady‐state analytical solutions or applied transient techniques to study temperature‐depth profiles recorded at only a single point in time. Transient analyses of a single profile are predicated on the accurate determination of an unknown profile at some time in the past to form the initial condition. In this study, we use both analytical solutions and a numerical model to demonstrate that boreholes with temperature‐depth profiles recorded at multiple times can be analyzed to either overcome the uncertainty associated with estimating unknown initial conditions or to form an additional check for the profile fitting. We further illustrate that the common approach of assuming a linear initial temperature‐depth profile can result in significant errors for groundwater flux estimates. Profiles obtained from a borehole in the Veluwe area, Netherlands in both 1978 and 2016 are analyzed for an illustrative example. Since many temperature‐depth profiles were collected in the late 1970s and 1980s, these previously profiled boreholes represent a significant and underexploited opportunity to obtain repeat measurements that can be used for similar analyses at other sites around the world. Key Points: Repeated temperature‐depth profiles provide an excellent opportunity to study the transience of subsurface heat flow processes The classic approach to infer ground water flow from temperature‐depth profiles disturbed by surface warming has serious shortcomings Novel analytical approaches provide good estimates of groundwater flow when used on repeated temperature‐depth profiles