Multi-risk approach and urban resilience. Issue 2 (11th April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Komendantova, Nadejda; Scolobig, Anna; Garcia-Aristizabal, Alexander; Monfort, Daniel; Fleming, Kevin
• Is Part Of: International journal of disaster resilience in the built environment. Volume 7:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 114
• Page End: 132
• Publication Date: 2016-04-11
• Subjects: Governance -- Participatory approaches -- Resilience -- Risk analysis -- Disaster mitigation -- Natural disasters; Emergency management -- Periodicals; Building -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; City planning -- Periodicals; 363.34525
• DOI: 10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2015-0013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1759-5908

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Urban resilience is becoming increasingly important due to increasing degree of urbanization and a combination of several factors affecting urban vulnerability. Urban resilience is also understood as a capacity of a system to prepare, respond and recover from multi-hazard threats. The purpose of multi-risk approach (MRA) is to take into consideration interdependencies between multiple risks, which can trigger a chain of natural and manmade events with different spatial and temporal scales. The purpose of this study is to understand correlation between multi-risk approach and urban resilience. Design/methodology/approach: To increase urban resilience, MRA should also include multi-risk governance, which is based on understanding how existing institutional and governance structures, individual judgments and communication of risk assessment results shape decision-making processes. Findings: This paper is based on extensive fieldwork in the test studies of Naples, Italy and Guadeloupe, France, the historical case study analysis and the stakeholders' interviews, workshops and focus groups discussions. Originality/value: Multi-risk is a relatively new field in science, only partially developed in social and geosciences. The originality of this research is in establishment of a link between MRA, including both assessment and governance, and urban resilience. In this paper, the authors take a holistic and systemic look at the MRA, including all stages of knowledge generation and decision-making. Both, knowledge generation and decision-making are reinforced by behavioural biases, different perceptions and institutional factors. Further on, the authors develop recommendations on how an MRA can contribute to urban resilience.