A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings. Issue 3 (September 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings. Issue 3 (September 2018)
- Main Title:
- A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings
- Authors:
- LeBel, Etienne P.
McCarthy, Randy J.
Earp, Brian D.
Elson, Malte
Vanpaemel, Wolf - Abstract:
- Societies invest in scientific studies to better understand the world and attempt to harness such improved understanding to address pressing societal problems. Published research, however, can be useful for theory or application only if it is credible. In science, a credible finding is one that has repeatedly survived risky falsification attempts. However, state-of-the-art meta-analytic approaches cannot determine the credibility of an effect because they do not account for the extent to which each included study has survived such attempted falsification. To overcome this problem, we outline a unified framework for estimating the credibility of published research by examining four fundamental falsifiability-related dimensions: (a) transparency of the methods and data, (b) reproducibility of the results when the same data-processing and analytic decisions are reapplied, (c) robustness of the results to different data-processing and analytic decisions, and (d) replicability of the effect. This framework includes a standardized workflow in which the degree to which a finding has survived scrutiny is quantified along these four facets of credibility. The framework is demonstrated by applying it to published replications in the psychology literature. Finally, we outline a Web implementation of the framework and conclude by encouraging the community of researchers to contribute to the development and crowdsourcing of this platform.
- Is Part Of:
- Advances in methods and practices in psychological science. Volume 1:Issue 3(2018)
- Journal:
- Advances in methods and practices in psychological science
- Issue:
- Volume 1:Issue 3(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 1, Issue 3 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 1
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0001-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 389
- Page End:
- 402
- Publication Date:
- 2018-09
- Subjects:
- research credibility -- transparency -- open science -- analytic reproducibility -- analytic robustness -- replicability
Psychology -- Periodicals
Psychology -- Research -- Periodicals
150 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ampa ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2515245918787489 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2515-2459
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8689.xml