Effects of Proud Large Osteochondral Plugs on Contact Forces and Knee Kinematics: A Robotic Study. Issue 9 (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Du, Peter Z.; Markolf, Keith L.; Boguszewski, Daniel V.; Yamaguchi, Kent T.; Lama, Christopher J.; McAllister, David R.; Jones, Kristofer J.
• Is Part Of: American journal of sports medicine. Volume 46:Issue 9(2018)
• Page Start: 2122
• Page End: 2127
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: osteochondral allograft transplantation -- biomechanics -- knee -- contact force -- robotic; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546518770415
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-5465

Abstract

Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is used to treat large focal femoral condylar articular cartilage defects. A proud plug could affect graft survival by altering contact forces (CFs) and knee kinematics. Hypothesis: A proud OCA plug will significantly increase CF and significantly alter knee kinematics throughout controlled knee flexion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Human cadaver knees had miniature load cells, each with a 20-mm-diameter cylinder of native bone/cartilage attached at its exact anatomic position, installed in both femoral condyles at standardized locations representative of clinical defects. Spacers were inserted to create proud plug conditions of +0.5, +1.0, and +1.5 mm. CFs and knee kinematics were recorded as a robot flexed the knee continuously from 0° to 50° under 1000 N of tibiofemoral compression. Results: CFs were increased significantly (vs flush) for all proudness conditions between 0° and 45° of flexion (medial) and 0° to 50° of flexion (lateral). At 20°, the average increases in medial CF for +0.5-mm, +1-mm, and +1.5-mm proudness were +80 N (+36%), +155 N (+70%), and +193 N (+87%), respectively. Corresponding increases with proud lateral plugs were +44 N (+14%), +90 N (+29%), and +118 N (+38%). CF increases for medial plugs at 20° of flexion were significantly greater than those for lateral plugs at all proudness conditions. At 50°, a 1-mm proud lateral plug significantly decreased internal tibial rotation by 15.4° and decreased valgus rotation by 2.5°. Conclusion: A proud medial or lateral plug significantly increased CF between 0° and 45° of flexion. Our results suggest that a medial plug at 20° may be more sensitive to graft incongruity than a lateral plug. The changes in rotational kinematics with proud lateral plugs were attributed to earlier contact between the proud plug's surface and the lateral meniscus, leading to rim impingement with decreased tibial rotation. Clinical Relevance: Increased CF and altered knee kinematics from a proud femoral plug could affect graft viability. Plug proudness of only 0.5 mm produced significant changes in CF and knee kinematics, and the clinically accepted 1-mm tolerance may need to be reexamined in view of our findings.