Contributors to the length-of-stay trajectory in burn-injured patients. Issue 8 (December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dolp, Reinhard; Rehou, Sarah; McCann, Matthew R.; Jeschke, Marc G.
• Is Part Of: Burns. Volume 44:Issue 8(2018)
• Page Start: 2011
• Page End: 2017
• Publication Date: 2018-12
• Subjects: ABA American Burn Association -- ARDS Acute respiratory distress syndrome -- ICU Intensive care unit -- LOS Length of stay -- OR Odds ratio -- TBSA Total burn surface area; Length of stay -- Burns -- Comorbidities -- In-hospital complications; Burns and scalds -- Periodicals; 617.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.07.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-4179

Abstract

Highlights: Critical care patients can have a complex medical history that might interfere with early recovery and discharge. Events in-hospital had a high influence on longer-than-expected-length of stay per percent burn. The conventional one day per percent burn should be updated to better evaluate metrics for quality indicators. Abstract: Objectives: Burn patients have a highly variable length-of-stay (LOS) due to the complexity of the injury itself. The LOS for burn patients is estimated as one day per percent total body surface area (TBSA) burn. To focus care expectation and prognosis we aimed to identify key factors that contribute to prolonged LOS. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort-study (2006-2016) in an adult burn-centre that included patients with ≥10% TBSA burn. Patients were stratified into expected-LOS (<2 days LOS/%TBSA) and longer-than-expected-LOS (≥2 days LOS/%TBSA). We assessed demographics, comorbidities, and in-hospital complications. Logistic regression and propensity matching was utilized. Results: Of the 583 total patients, 477 had an expected-LOS whereas 106 a longer-than-expected-LOS. Non-modifiable factors such as age, 3rd degree TBSA%, inhalation injuries and comorbidities were greater in the exceeded LOS patients. Subsequent matched analysis revealed factors like number of procedures performed, days ventilated and in-hospital complications (bacteremia, pneumonia, sepsis, graft loss, and respiratory failure) were significantly increased in the longer-than-expected-LOS group. Conclusions: Progress has been made to update the conventional one day/%TBSA to better aid health care providers in giving appropriate outcomes for patients and their families and to supply intensive care units with valuable data to assess quality of care and to improve patient prognosis.