Response to "Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition". (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shipworth, David; Fell, Michael J.; Elam, Simon
• Is Part Of: Energy policy. Volume 124(2019)
• Page Start: 418
• Page End: 420
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: Energy policy -- Periodicals; Politique énergétique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 333.79
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.039
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4215

Abstract

Abstract: Sovacool et al. (2017) consider and critique the Smart Metering Implementation Programme (SMIP) in the United Kingdom. In this response we highlight a number of areas where we believe it would have been helpful for readers to see additional information. These relate to three areas: how the authors reported on the methods used in their study; how the Programme is addressing technical challenges; and how the Programme is engaging with people in vulnerable situations. We also point out areas where we see emerging challenges, such as engaging non-traditional stakeholders, and how organizations which want to use smart meter data in the public interest might encounter barriers in meeting the demands of the Smart Energy Code.