Understanding animal (ab)use: Green criminological contributions, missed opportunities and a way forward. (August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Taylor, Nik; Fitzgerald, Amy
• Is Part Of: Theoretical criminology. Volume 22:Number 3(2018:Jul.)
• Page Start: 402
• Page End: 425
• Publication Date: 2018-08
• Subjects: Animal abuse -- animal harm -- animal studies -- ecofeminism -- green criminology; Criminology -- Periodicals; 364.01
• DOI: 10.1177/1362480618787173
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1362-4806

Abstract

While the last two decades have witnessed considerable growth in green criminology, the positioning of nonhuman animals within the field remains unclear and contested. This article provides an analysis of green criminological work—published since the 1998 special issue of Theoretical Criminology —that addresses harms and crime perpetrated against nonhuman animals. We assess trends in the quantity of the work over time and how the treatment of nonhuman animals has unfolded through an analysis of green criminology articles, chapters in edited volumes and monographs. We find that while the amount of consideration given to nonhuman animals by green criminologists has increased dramatically over the years, much of this work has focused on crimes and harms against wild animals (e.g. "wildlife poaching", "trafficking"), comparatively less attention has been paid to so-called "domesticated animals" or to larger questions of species justice. Based on these findings, we consider how concepts in critical animal studies, ecofeminism and feminist intersectional theories may be utilized in green criminological debates regarding animal (ab)use. With the goal of stimulating further work in this vein, we outline three areas where green criminology has much to offer: (1) researching and exposing meat production and consumption as a form of animal abuse and as a major contributor to global climate change; (2) bridging the divide between environmentalism, animal advocacy and their associated areas of academic study; and (3) refining and reflecting on methodological choices, all with the aim of developing a nonspeciesist green criminology.