Death of a Simulated Pediatric Patient: Toward a More Robust Theoretical Framework. Issue 6 (December 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Death of a Simulated Pediatric Patient: Toward a More Robust Theoretical Framework. Issue 6 (December 2017)
- Main Title:
- Death of a Simulated Pediatric Patient
- Authors:
- McBride, Mary E.
Schinasi, Dana Aronson
Moga, Michael Alice
Tripathy, Shreepada
Calhoun, Aaron - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: A theoretical framework was recently proposed that encapsulates learner responses to simulated death due to action or inaction in the pediatric context. This framework, however, was developed at an institution that allows simulated death and thus does not address the experience of those centers at which this technique is not used. To address this, we performed a parallel qualitative study with the intent of augmenting the initial framework. Methods: We conducted focus groups, using a constructivist grounded theory approach, using physicians and nurses who have experienced a simulated cardiac arrest. The participants were recruited via e-mail. Transcripts were analyzed by coders blinded to the original framework to generate a list of provisional themes that were iteratively refined. These themes were then compared with the themes from the original article and used to derive a consensus model that incorporated the most relevant features of each. Results: Focus group data yielded 7 themes. Six were similar to those developed in the original framework. One important exception was noted; however, those learners not exposed to patient death due to action or inaction often felt that the mannequin's survival was artificial. This additional theme was incorporated into a revised framework. Discussion: The original framework addresses most aspects of learner reactions to simulated death. Our work suggests that adding the theme pertaining to the lack of realismAbstract : Introduction: A theoretical framework was recently proposed that encapsulates learner responses to simulated death due to action or inaction in the pediatric context. This framework, however, was developed at an institution that allows simulated death and thus does not address the experience of those centers at which this technique is not used. To address this, we performed a parallel qualitative study with the intent of augmenting the initial framework. Methods: We conducted focus groups, using a constructivist grounded theory approach, using physicians and nurses who have experienced a simulated cardiac arrest. The participants were recruited via e-mail. Transcripts were analyzed by coders blinded to the original framework to generate a list of provisional themes that were iteratively refined. These themes were then compared with the themes from the original article and used to derive a consensus model that incorporated the most relevant features of each. Results: Focus group data yielded 7 themes. Six were similar to those developed in the original framework. One important exception was noted; however, those learners not exposed to patient death due to action or inaction often felt that the mannequin's survival was artificial. This additional theme was incorporated into a revised framework. Discussion: The original framework addresses most aspects of learner reactions to simulated death. Our work suggests that adding the theme pertaining to the lack of realism that can be perceived when the mannequin is unexpectedly saved results in a more robust theoretical framework transferable to centers that do not allow mannequin death. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Simulation in healthcare. Volume 12:Issue 6(2017)
- Journal:
- Simulation in healthcare
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Issue 6(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 6 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0012-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-12
- Subjects:
- Mannequin death -- simulation -- qualitative -- theoretical framework -- theory -- simulation-based medical education -- ethics -- cognitive load -- debriefing -- learning -- stress
Simulated patients -- Periodicals
362.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01253104-000000000-00000 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01266021-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/simulationinhealthcare/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.simulationinhealthcare.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000265 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1559-2332
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8285.164020
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8648.xml