Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs in nondiabetic patients with hypertension: A population‐based study. Issue 10 (29th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Machado, Marina Amaral de Ávila; de Moura, Cristiano Soares; Wang, Yishu; Danieli, Coraline; Abrahamowicz, Michal; Bernatsky, Sasha; Behlouli, Hassan; Pilote, Louise
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical hypertension. Volume 19:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: 999
• Page End: 1009
• Publication Date: 2017-07-29
• Subjects: antihypertensive therapy -- comparative effectiveness research -- drug addition -- drug discontinuation -- hypertension; Hypertension -- Periodicals; 616.132
• DOI: 10.1111/jch.13055
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1524-6175

Abstract

Abstract : The authors compared the effectiveness of thiazide diuretic (TD), angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapies for the treatment of nondiabetic hypertension using MarketScan Databases 2010–2014. Multivariable Cox regression models assessed whether the addition of a new antihypertensive drug, treatment discontinuation, or switch and major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events varied across groups. A total of 565 009 patients started monotherapy with ACEIs (43.6%), CCBs (23.6%), TDs (18.8%), or ARBs (14.0%). Patients who took TDs had a higher risk for either drug addition or discontinuation than patients who took ACEIs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.68–0.70] vs HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.80–0.81]), ARBs (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.66–0.68] vs HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.65–0.67]), and CCBs (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.84–0.87] vs HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93–0.95]). Conversely, patients who took TDs experienced a lower risk of clinical events compared with patients who took ACEIs (HR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.15–1.33]), ARBs (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.18–1.39]), and CCBs (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.25–1.46]). Our results provide a strong rationale for choosing TDs as first‐line monotherapy for the control of hypertension.