Climate Change Scepticism: Reconsidering How to Respond to Core Criticisms of Climate Science and Policy. (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Van Rensburg, Willem; Head, Brian W.
• Is Part Of: SAGE Open. Volume 7:Number 4(2017:Oct./Dec.)
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: climate change -- scepticism -- global warming -- climate change denial -- Leximancer analysis; Social sciences -- Periodicals; 300.5
• DOI: 10.1177/2158244017748983
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2158-2440

Abstract

The contextual drivers of climate change scepticism are well described and explained in the literature. A key assumption underlying most of the scholarly constructions of the sceptical phenomenon is that the key objections raised by sceptics to climate science and climate policy proposals represent some form of submerged deception or self-delusion on their part. This article refocuses attention on sceptics' central criticisms, and argues that direct responses to these criticisms should not be neglected in favor of a primary focus on sceptics' possible inner motivations. The article investigates the core objections raised by sceptics, with particular attention to the views of one prominent Australian sceptic, Andrew Bolt. We argue that some of these objections should be treated as legitimate forms of dissent, and that ongoing constructive responses to such criticisms are necessary to counter the impact of climate change scepticism.