The effects of psychological interventions on wound healing: A systematic review of randomized trials. Issue 4 (3rd July 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The effects of psychological interventions on wound healing: A systematic review of randomized trials. Issue 4 (3rd July 2017)
- Main Title:
- The effects of psychological interventions on wound healing: A systematic review of randomized trials
- Authors:
- Robinson, Hayley
Norton, Sam
Jarrett, Paul
Broadbent, Elizabeth - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: Psychological stress has been shown to delay wound healing. Several trials have investigated whether psychological interventions can improve wound healing, but to date, this evidence base has not been systematically synthesized. The objective was to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials in humans investigating whether psychological interventions can enhance wound healing. Methods: A systematic review was performed using PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and MEDLINE. The searches included all papers published in English up until September 2016. The reference lists of relevant papers were screened manually to identify further review articles or relevant studies. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Results: Fifteen of nineteen studies were of high methodological quality. Six studies were conducted with acute experimentally created wounds, five studies with surgical patients, two studies with burn wounds, two studies with fracture wounds, and four studies were conducted with ulcer wounds. Post‐intervention standardized mean differences (SMD) between groups across all intervention types ranged from 0.13 to 3.21, favouring improved healing, particularly for surgical patients and for relaxation interventions. However, there was some evidence for publication bias suggesting negative studies may not have been reported. Due to the heterogeneity of wound types, population types, and intervention types, itAbstract : Purpose: Psychological stress has been shown to delay wound healing. Several trials have investigated whether psychological interventions can improve wound healing, but to date, this evidence base has not been systematically synthesized. The objective was to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials in humans investigating whether psychological interventions can enhance wound healing. Methods: A systematic review was performed using PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and MEDLINE. The searches included all papers published in English up until September 2016. The reference lists of relevant papers were screened manually to identify further review articles or relevant studies. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Results: Fifteen of nineteen studies were of high methodological quality. Six studies were conducted with acute experimentally created wounds, five studies with surgical patients, two studies with burn wounds, two studies with fracture wounds, and four studies were conducted with ulcer wounds. Post‐intervention standardized mean differences (SMD) between groups across all intervention types ranged from 0.13 to 3.21, favouring improved healing, particularly for surgical patients and for relaxation interventions. However, there was some evidence for publication bias suggesting negative studies may not have been reported. Due to the heterogeneity of wound types, population types, and intervention types, it is difficult to pool effect sizes across studies. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that psychological interventions may aid wound healing. Although promising, more research is needed to assess the efficacy of each intervention on different wound types. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Psychological stress negatively affects wound healing. A number of studies have investigated whether psychological interventions can improve healing. However, no systematic reviews have been conducted. What does this study add? Synthesis and review of 19 trials conducted on psychological interventions and wound healing. Most evidence supports improved healing, particularly for surgical wounds and relaxation interventions. More research is needed on different intervention types with clinical wounds and into mechanisms of action. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of health psychology. Volume 22:Issue 4(2017)
- Journal:
- British journal of health psychology
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Issue 4(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 4 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0022-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 805
- Page End:
- 835
- Publication Date:
- 2017-07-03
- Subjects:
- psychological intervention -- relaxation -- social support -- stress -- systematic review -- wound healing
Clinical health psychology -- Periodicals
613.019 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8287/issues ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjhp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjhp.12257 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-107X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2309.080000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8610.xml