Optimal Timing for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Systematic Review. (June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Friis, C.; Rothman, J. P.; Burcharth, J.; Rosenberg, J.
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of surgery. Volume 107:Number 2(2018)
• Page Start: 99
• Page End: 106
• Publication Date: 2018-06
• Subjects: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -- hepato-pancreatic biliary surgery -- laparoscopic cholecystectomy -- conversion rate -- time delay -- complication; Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1177/1457496917748224
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1457-4969

Abstract

Background and Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is often used as definitive treatment for common bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal time interval between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing different time delays between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials were included. Primary outcome was conversion rate from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy and secondary outcomes were complications, mortality, operating time, and length of stay. Results: A total of 14 studies with a total of 1930 patients were included. The pooled estimate revealed an increase from a 4.2% conversion rate when laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed within 24 h of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to 7.6% for 24–72 h delay to 12.3% when performed within 2 weeks, to 12.3% for 2–6 weeks, and to a 14% conversion rate when operation was delayed more than 6 weeks. Conclusion: According to this systematic review, it is preferable to perform cholecystectomy within 24 h of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to reduce conversion rate. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not increase mortality, perioperative complications, or length of stay and on the contrary it reduces the risk of reoccurrence and progression of disease in the delay between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.