Variability in Child Protection Medical Evaluations of Suspected Physical Abuse in Four European Countries: A Vignette Study. (18th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Naughton, Aideen; Nurmatov, Ulugbek; Hoytema Van Konijnenburg, Eva; Watkins, W. John; Otterman, Gabriel; Nelson, Joanne; Kemp, Alison
• Is Part Of: Child abuse review. Volume 27:Number 5(2018)
• Page Start: 404
• Page End: 418
• Publication Date: 2018-11-18
• Subjects: physical abuse -- children -- comparative survey -- medical assessment -- Europe; Child abuse -- Periodicals; Child abuse -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Abused children -- Services for -- Periodicals; Abused children -- Services for -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 362.76
• DOI: 10.1002/car.2515
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0952-9136

Abstract

Abstract : When suspicions of physical abuse arise, children are referred for a child protection medical evaluation, which occurs in a variety of health settings by a variety of clinicians. This comparative vignette survey was performed among a cross‐section of medical professionals engaged in child protection in Sweden, Ireland, the UK and the Netherlands between April and July 2016. Three vignettes describing different probabilities of physical abuse were included. Components of child protection medical evaluations across the four countries were analysed. A total of 236 physicians responded (113 UK, 49 the Netherlands, 39 Sweden, 35 Ireland). Of these, 62 per cent were female (there were more females in the UK, Sweden and the Netherlands). More variation in practice than similarities was found. Similarities: experience level, confidence level and management approach (vignettes 1 and 3). Cross‐country differences: decision to investigate, adherence to national guidelines, experience versus specialism and subsequent management post‐assessment. These findings suggest the need for further exploration of practice between countries including specific and regular training, availability of support for non‐specialists and use of national and international clinical guidelines to promote best practice and reduce variation. More consideration of the human and financial cost to the healthcare system of unnecessary investigations and the length of hospital admission may be warranted. Key Practitioner Messages: There is a lack of uniformity in the clinical management of physical abuse between these four European countries. Specific and regular training included in professional development plans and discussed at appraisal will promote clinician confidence in assessments. Expert support should be easily available to non‐specialists undertaking these assessments. National and local clinical guidelines are important tools in promoting best practice and reducing variation across and within countries.