Selection of Higher Risk Pregnancies into Veterans Health Administration Programs: Discoveries from Linked Department of Veterans Affairs and California Birth Data. (10th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shaw, Jonathan G.; Joyce, Vilija R.; Schmitt, Susan K.; Frayne, Susan M.; Shaw, Kate A.; Danielsen, Beate; Kimerling, Rachel; Asch, Steven M.; Phibbs, Ciaran S.
• Other Names: Hynes Denise M. guestEditor.; Maciejewski Matthew L. guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Health services research. Volume 53(2018)Supplement 3
• Page Start: 5260
• Page End: 5284
• Publication Date: 2018-09-10
• Subjects: Maternal care -- pregnancy -- Veterans -- health services -- California; Medical care -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Hospital care -- Periodicals; Health services administration -- Periodicals; 362
• DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13041
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-9124

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To describe variation in payer and outcomes in Veterans' births. Data/Setting: Secondary data analyses of deliveries in California, 2000–2012. Study Design: We performed a retrospective, population‐based study of all live births to Veterans (confirmed via U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) enrollment records), to identify payer and variations in outcomes among: (1) Veterans using VA coverage and (2) Veteran vs. all other births. We calculated odds ratios (aOR) adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, education, and obstetric demographics. Methods: We anonymously linked VA administrative data for all female VA enrollees with California birth records. Principal Findings: From 2000 to 2012, we identified 17, 495 births to Veterans. VA covered 8.6 percent (1, 508), Medicaid 17.3 percent, and Private insurance 47.6 percent. Veterans who relied on VA health coverage had more preeclampsia (aOR 1.4, CI 1.0–1.8) and more cesarean births (aOR 1.2, CI 1.0–1.3), and, despite similar prematurity, trended toward more neonatal intensive care (NICU) admissions (aOR 1.2, CI 1.0–1.4) compared to Veterans using other (non‐Medicaid) coverage. Overall, Veterans' birth outcomes (all‐payer) mirrored California's birth outcomes, with the exception of excess NICU care (aOR 1.15, CI 1.1–1.2). Conclusions: VA covers a higher risk fraction of Veterans' births, justifying maternal care coordination and attention to the maternal–fetal impacts of Veterans' comorbidities.