Not all artificial structures are created equal: Pilings linked to greater ecological and environmental change in sediment communities than seawalls. (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heery, Eliza C.; Dafforn, Katherine A.; Smith, James A.; Ushiama, Shinjiro; Mayer-Pinto, Mariana
• Is Part Of: Marine environmental research. Volume 142(2018)
• Page Start: 286
• Page End: 294
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: Ocean sprawl -- Urban infrastructure -- Shoreline armoring -- Sedimentary ecosystems -- Soft bottom -- Ecology -- Environmental impact; Marine pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Marine ecology -- Periodicals; Mer -- Pollution -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Écologie marine -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 577.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.08.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0141-1136

Abstract

Abstract: Artificial structures are agents of change in marine ecosystems. They add novel habitat for hard-substrate organisms and modify the surrounding environment. Most research to date has focused on the communities living directly on artificial structures, and more research is needed on the potential impacts these structures have on nearby communities and the surrounding environment. We compared the sedimentary habitat surrounding two types of artificial structures (pilings and seawalls) to sediments adjacent to rocky reefs using a combination of traditional sediment analyses, stable isotope analysis, and environmental DNA. Artificial and natural shore sediments were best differentiated by sediment variables strongly associated with flow speed. Pilings sediments had significantly finer grain size, higher organic content, and generally lower C:N ratios than sediments adjacent to the other habitat types, suggesting flow is reduced by pilings. Sedimentary assemblages near pilings were also consistent with those predicted under low-flow conditions, with elevated bacterial colonization and increased relative abundances of small deposit feeders compared with other habitat types. Additionally, lumbrinerid polychaetes in pilings sediments had reduced δ 15 N values, suggesting different detrital resources and fewer trophic linkages compared with lumbrinerids in other habitats. Woody detritus was greater adjacent to seawalls than to natural rocky shores or pilings. Our findings suggest that artificial structures have the potential to influence adjacent soft sediments through changes to sediment properties that affect infaunal and microbial communities, as well as trophic linkages for some consumers. We hypothesize that this is due to a combination of altered flow, differing detrital subsidies, and differing adjacent land-use among habitat types. Managers should consider the potential for changed sediment properties and ecology when deciding where to build different types of artificial structures. Further manipulative experiments are needed to understand mechanisms of change and help manage the impacts of artificial structures on the seafloor. Highlights: Sediments differ adjacent to artificial versus natural shores. Fine, enriched sediments near pilings support particularly distinct biotic assemblages. Flow and detrital flux likely mediate community response to artificial structures. Changes associated with artificial structures can alter sedimentary trophic linkages. Sedimentary ecosystem health should be considered in future artificial shore designs.