Classification of Uterine Anomalies by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography Using ESHRE/ESGE Criteria: Interobserver Variability. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bermejo, C.; Martínez-Ten, P.; Ruíz-López, L.; Estévez, M.; Gil, M. M.
• Is Part Of: Reproductive sciences. Volume 25:Number 5(2018:May)
• Page Start: 740
• Page End: 747
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: uterine anomalies -- classification -- interobserver variability -- three-dimensional imaging -- ultrasonography; Reproductive health -- Periodicals; Reproduction -- Periodicals; 612.6
• DOI: 10.1177/1933719117725825
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1933-7191

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the interobserver repeatability of the coronal view measurements and classification of the uterine malformations (UM) according to the ESHRE/ESGE consensus by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US). Methods: 89 transvaginal 3D-US volumes acquired during the last two years at Delta Ecografía in Madrid, Spain, were selected from our archive by convenience sampling. Two expert operators blinded from each other, performed post-hoc analysis using render mode and multiplanar-Volume Contrast Imaging (VCI) navigation. Uterine wall thickness at the fundus, indentation of the cavity and indentation of the fundus were measured, classified and sub-classified following the recommendations of the ESHRE/ESGE consensus. The reproducibility of interobserver measurements and classification was examined by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and kappa statistic (k). Results: Repeatability in the measurements: uterine wall thickness: ICC = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), P < 0.0001; indentation of the cavity: ICC = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96), P < 0.0001; indentation of the fundus: ICC = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), P < 0.0001. Level of agreement in the classification: overall (U0, U1, U2, U3, U4, U5): k = 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.84), P > 0.0001; U2 (U2a, U2b): k = 0.56 (95% CI, 0.31-0.80), P < 0.001 (0.78 observed agreement compared to 0.49 expected); U3 (U3a, U3b, U3c): k = 0.69 (95% CI, 0.16-1.00), P < 0.05 (0.85 observed agreement compared to 0.53 expected); U4 (U4a, U4b): k = 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-1.00), P < 0.0001. Conclusions: Transvaginal 3D-US examination of the uterus allows assessment and classification of the UM by the ESHRE/ESGE criteria showing a good interobserver repeatability and reproducibility in most cases.