Cognitive screening tools for primary care settings: examining the 'Test Your Memory' and 'General Practitioner assessment of Cognition' tools in a rural aging population in Greece. (2nd October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Iatraki, Eliza; Simos, Panagiotis G.; Bertsias, Antonios; Duijker, George; Zaganas, Ioannis; Tziraki, Chariklia; Vgontzas, Alexandros N.; Lionis, Christos
• Is Part Of: European journal of general practice. Volume 23:Number 1(2017:Mar.)
• Page Start: 172
• Page End: 179
• Publication Date: 2017-10-02
• Subjects: Cognitive screening -- primary care setting -- rural population; Family medicine -- Periodicals; 362.172
• DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1324845
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1381-4788

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Under conditions of high demand for primary care services in a setting of low financial resources, there is need for brief, easily administered cognitive screening tools for use in the primary care setting, especially in rural areas. However, interpretation of these cognitive tests' results requires knowledge on their susceptibility to cultural, educational and demographic patient characteristics. Objectives: To assess the clinical validity of the 'Test Your Memory' (TYM) and 'General Practitioner assessment of Cognition' (GPCog) which was specifically designed for primary care practice, in a rural primary care setting in Greece, utilizing the 'Mini Mental State Examination' (MMSE) as a reference standard. Methods: The MMSE, TYM, and GPCog were administered to a random sample of 319 community dwelling Greek adults aged 60 to 89 years in 11 rural Primary Healthcare Centres of the Prefecture of Heraklion on the island of Crete, Greece. Analyses examined (a) The association of each instrument with demographic factors and MMSE and (b) optimal cut-off scores, sensitivity and specificity against MMSE-based cognitive impairment risk using ROC analyses with the MMSE 23/24 point cut-off as a reference standard. Results: We found a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 77% for TYM (35/36 or 38/39 cut-off, depending on education). Corresponding values were 89% and 61% for GPCog (7/8 cut-off), respectively. Conclusion: The TYM and GPCog instruments appear to be suitable for routine use in the primary care setting as tools for cognitive impairment risk detection in elderly rural populations.