Effect of hydrophobic fluoropolymer and crystallinity on the hydrolytic degradation of poly(lactic acid). (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Huang, Yun; Chen, Fu; Pan, Yonghao; Chen, Chong; Jiang, Long; Dan, Yi
• Is Part Of: European polymer journal. Volume 97(2017)
• Page Start: 308
• Page End: 318
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Fluoro-copolymer -- Poly(lactic acid) -- Crystalline -- Dispersion -- Hydrolysis; Polymers -- Periodicals; Polymerization -- Periodicals; Polymères -- Périodiques; Polymérisation -- Périodiques; Polymerization; Polymers; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 547.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.09.044
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0014-3057

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: The hydrolytic rates of PLA and the blends were related to the initial morphology. Crystalline affected the effect of the fluoropolymers on the PLA' hydrolysis. The miscibility and dispersion influenced the hydrolytic rate of PLA. Abstract: Hydrolytic behaviors of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) films with different crystallinities (∼0, 30 and 40%) containing hydrophobic fluoropolymers were studied by evaluating the hydrophobicity and water absorption through measuring contact angle and FTIR, and by investigating the evolution of average molecular weights, morphology and thermal property. The results showed that the hydrophobic fluoropolymers enhanced the hydrophobicity of the surface of PLA, where water contact angle increased about 20°, but they did not cause a decrease in water absorption in the bulk of PLA. The hydrolytic rate of samples was affected by both crystallinity of the PLA component and dispersion of the hydrophobic fluoropolymers. For amorphous samples, the fluoropolymers could well disperse in the PLA substrate and accelerate the hydrolysis of PLA component. The amorphous PLA had a hydrolytic rate of 0.0335 week −1, while the rate of the amorphous sample with hydrophobic fluoropolymers increased up to 0.0458 week −1 . For the crystallized samples, neat PLA hydrolyzed faster than the blends. For example, the rate of PLA crystallized at 90 °C was 0.0423 week −1 while the values of the blends with PLA- b -PFMA10 and PLA- b -PFMA20 were 0.0325 and 0.0260 week −1, respectively. The difference between the blends was related to the dispersion of the fluoropolymers that the badly-dispersed fluoropolymer had better hydrolytic resistance effect than that of the well-dispersed fluoropolymer.