Perils and positives of science journalism in Australia. (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McKinnon, Merryn; Howes, Johanna; Leach, Andrew; Prokop, Natasha
• Is Part Of: Public understanding of science. Volume 27:Number 5(2018)
• Page Start: 562
• Page End: 577
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: media and science -- science communication -- science journalism; Science news -- Periodicals; Science -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 303.483
• DOI: 10.1177/0963662517701589
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0963-6625

Abstract

Scientists, science communicators and science journalists interact to deliver science news to the public. Yet the value of interactions between the groups in delivering high-quality science stories is poorly understood within Australia. A recent study in New Zealand on the perspectives of the three groups on the challenges facing science journalism is replicated here in the context of New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. While all three groups perceived the quality of science journalism as generally high, the limitations of non-specialists and public relation materials were causes for concern. The results indicate that science communicators are considered to play a valuable role as facilitators of information flow to journalists and support for scientists. Future studies on the influence and implications of interactions between these three groups are required.