Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Issue 3 (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Issue 3 (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
- Authors:
- Meininger, Vincent
Genge, Angela
van den Berg, Leonard H
Robberecht, Wim
Ludolph, Albert
Chio, Adriano
Kim, Seung H
Leigh, P Nigel
Kiernan, Matthew C
Shefner, Jeremy M
Desnuelle, Claude
Morrison, Karen E
Petri, Susanne
Boswell, Diane
Temple, Jane
Mohindra, Rajat
Davies, Matt
Bullman, Jonathan
Rees, Paul
Lavrov, Arseniy - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Neurite outgrowth inhibitor A (Nogo-A) is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A showed a positive effect in the SOD1 G93A mouse model of ALS, and a humanised form of this antibody (ozanezumab) was well tolerated in a first-in-human trial. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with ALS. Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was done in 34 centres in 11 countries. Patients aged 18–80 years with a diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS were randomly assigned (1:1), centrally according to a computer-generated allocation schedule, to receive ozanezumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo as intravenous infusions over 1 h every 2 weeks for 46 weeks, followed by assessments at week 48 and week 60. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was a joint-rank analysis of function (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised) and overall survival, analysed at 48 weeks in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT01753076, and withGSK-ClinicalStudyRegister.com, NOG112264, and is completed. Findings: Between Dec 20, 2012, and Nov 1, 2013, we recruited 307 patients, of whom 303 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=151) or ozanezumab (n=152). The adjusted mean of the joint-rank score was −14·9 (SE 13·5) forSummary: Background: Neurite outgrowth inhibitor A (Nogo-A) is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A showed a positive effect in the SOD1 G93A mouse model of ALS, and a humanised form of this antibody (ozanezumab) was well tolerated in a first-in-human trial. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with ALS. Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was done in 34 centres in 11 countries. Patients aged 18–80 years with a diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS were randomly assigned (1:1), centrally according to a computer-generated allocation schedule, to receive ozanezumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo as intravenous infusions over 1 h every 2 weeks for 46 weeks, followed by assessments at week 48 and week 60. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was a joint-rank analysis of function (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised) and overall survival, analysed at 48 weeks in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT01753076, and withGSK-ClinicalStudyRegister.com, NOG112264, and is completed. Findings: Between Dec 20, 2012, and Nov 1, 2013, we recruited 307 patients, of whom 303 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=151) or ozanezumab (n=152). The adjusted mean of the joint-rank score was −14·9 (SE 13·5) for the ozanezumab group and 15·0 (13·6) for the placebo group, with a least squares mean difference of −30·0 (95% CI −67·9 to 7·9; p=0·12). Overall, reported adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of study drug or withdrawal from study were similar between the treatment groups, except for dyspepsia (ten [7%] in the ozanezumab group vs four [3%] in the placebo group), depression (11 [7%] vs five [3%]), and diarrhoea (25 [16%] vs 12 [8%]). Respiratory failure was the most common serious adverse event (12 [8%] vs seven [5%]). At week 60, the number of deaths was higher in the ozanezumab group (20 [13%]) than in the placebo group (16 [11%]), mainly as a result of respiratory failure (ten [7%] vs five [3%]). Two deaths were considered related to the study drug (bladder transitional cell carcinoma in the ozanezumab group and cerebrovascular accident in the placebo group). Interpretation: Ozanezumab did not show efficacy compared with placebo in patients with ALS. Therefore, Nogo-A does not seem to be an effective therapeutic target in ALS. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet neurology. Volume 16:Issue 3(2017:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Lancet neurology
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 3(2017:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0016-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 208
- Page End:
- 216
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- Neurology -- Periodicals
Neurology -- Periodicals
Nervous System Diseases -- Periodicals
Neurologie -- Périodiques
Neurology
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.805 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14744422 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30399-4 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1474-4422
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.084000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8558.xml