Movement characteristics, physiological and perceptual responses of elite standard youth football players to different high intensity running drills. Issue 4 (2nd October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gibson, Neil V.; Henning, Greig; Twist, Craig
• Is Part Of: Science and medicine in football. Volume 2:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 281
• Page End: 287
• Publication Date: 2018-10-02
• Subjects: Football -- interval training -- youth -- acute responses; Soccer injuries -- Periodicals; Soccer -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Soccer -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; 617.102763
• DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2018.1461235
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2473-3938

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose : To examine responses to high intensity running drills in youth football players. Methods : Seventeen players completed the YoYo Intermittent Recovery test level one (YYIR1) and a 15 m maximal sprint to quantify target running speeds. Players performed three conditions on separate occasions comprising: 12 × 15 s high intensity runs at 100% of the final YYIRT1 speed, 12 × ~ 4 s repeated sprints with ~26 s recovery, and combination running using both modalities. Heart rate was monitored continuously with PlayerLoad TM and movement characteristics using microtechnology. Ratings of perceived exertion and blood lactate responses were measured 2 min after the final repetition. The ratio of Flight:contraction time was calculated from a countermovement jump before and at 2 min and 14 h after each condition. Data analysis used magnitude based inferences and effect sizes statistics. Results : Peak speed (1.1%; ES 0.23 ± 0.44) and mean speed over the initial 4 s (6.3%; ES 0.45 ± 0.46) were possibly faster during combination compared to high intensity running with unclear differences compared to repeated sprinting. This was despite most likely (21.6%; ES 7.65 ± 1.02) differences in prescribed speeds between conditions. There were likely reductions in F:C at 14 h ratio after high intensity (−5.6%; ES – 0.44 ± 0.32) and combination running (−6.8%; ES −0.53 ± 0.47). Changes in the repeated sprinting condition were unclear . Conclusions : Actual movement characteristics of high intensity running drills may not reflect those used to prescribe them whilst reductions in F:C ratio are evident 14 h after their completion.