Improving the Interpretation of Fixed Effects Regression Results. Issue 4 (11th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mummolo, Jonathan; Peterson, Erik
• Is Part Of: Political science research and methods. Volume 6:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 829
• Page End: 835
• Publication Date: 2018-01-11
• Subjects: Political science -- Periodicals; 320
• DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2017.44
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-8470

Abstract

Abstract : Fixed effects estimators are frequently used to limit selection bias. For example, it is well known that with panel data, fixed effects models eliminate time-invariant confounding, estimating an independent variable's effect using only within-unit variation. When researchers interpret the results of fixed effects models, they should therefore consider hypothetical changes in the independent variable (counterfactuals) that could plausibly occur within units to avoid overstating the substantive importance of the variable's effect. In this article, we replicate several recent studies which used fixed effects estimators to show how descriptions of the substantive significance of results can be improved by precisely characterizing the variation being studied and presenting plausible counterfactuals. We provide a checklist for the interpretation of fixed effects regression results to help avoid these interpretative pitfalls.