Comparative Effectiveness of Conservative Management Compared to Cryotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients. Issue 5 (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shah, Surbhi; Young, Henry N.; Cobran, Ewan K.
• Is Part Of: American journal of men's health. Volume 12:Issue 5(2018)
• Page Start: 1681
• Page End: 1691
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: prostate cancer -- conservative management -- cryotherapy -- treatment side effects -- surveillance -- epidemiology -- end results; Men -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Sex factors in disease -- Periodicals; Men -- Health and hygiene -- Periodicals; Men -- Health and hygiene -- United States -- Periodicals; Men -- Medical care -- Periodicals; 362.10811
• DOI: 10.1177/1557988318781731
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1557-9883

Abstract

The high frequency of treatment-related side effects for men with localized prostate cancer creates uncertainty for treatment outcomes. This study assessed the comparative effectiveness of treatment-related side effects associated with conservative management and cryotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted, using the linked data of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare, which included patients diagnosed from 2000 through year 2013, and their Medicare claims information from 2000 through 2014. To compare the differences in baseline characteristics and treatment-related side effects between the study cohorts, χ 2 tests were conducted. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between treatment selection and side effects. There were 7, 998 and 3, 051 patients in the conservative management and cryotherapy cohort, respectively. The likelihood of erectile dysfunction, lower urinary tract obstruction, urinary fistula, urinary incontinence, and hydronephrosis was reported to be significantly lower (53%, 35%, 69%, 65%, and 36%, respectively) in the conservative management cohort. Conservative management had a lower likelihood of treatment-related side effects compared to cryotherapy. However, further research is needed to compare other significant long-term outcomes such as costs associated with these treatment choices and quality of life.