Comparison of different three dimensional-printed resorbable materials: In vitro biocompatibility, In vitro degradation rate, and cell differentiation support. (August 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of different three dimensional-printed resorbable materials: In vitro biocompatibility, In vitro degradation rate, and cell differentiation support. (August 2018)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of different three dimensional-printed resorbable materials: In vitro biocompatibility, In vitro degradation rate, and cell differentiation support
- Authors:
- Raddatz, Lukas
Kirsch, Marline
Geier, Dominik
Schaeske, Jörn
Acreman, Kevin
Gentsch, Rafael
Jones, Scott
Karau, Andreas
Washington, Tommy
Stiesch, Meike
Becker, Thomas
Beutel, Sascha
Scheper, Thomas
Lavrentieva, Antonina - Abstract:
- Biodegradable materials play a crucial role in both material and medical sciences and are frequently used as a primary commodity for implants generation. Due to their material inherent properties, they are supposed to be entirely resorbed by the patients' body after fulfilling their task as a scaffold. This makes a second intervention (e.g. for implant removal) redundant and significantly enhances a patient's post-operative life quality. At the moment, materials for resorbable and biodegradable implants (e.g. polylactic acid or poly-caprolactone polymers) are still intensively studied. They are able to provide mandatory demands such as mechanical strength and attributes needed for high-quality implants. Implants, however, not only need to be made of adequate material, but must also to be personalized in order to meet the customers' needs. Combining three dimensional-printing and high-resolution imaging technologies a new age of implant production comes into sight. Three dimensional images (e.g. magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) of tissue defects can be utilized as digital blueprints for personalized implants. Modern additive manufacturing devices are able to use a variety of materials to fabricate custom parts within short periods of time. The combination of high-quality resorbable materials and personalized three dimensional-printing for the custom application will provide the patients with the best suitable and sustainable implants. In this study, weBiodegradable materials play a crucial role in both material and medical sciences and are frequently used as a primary commodity for implants generation. Due to their material inherent properties, they are supposed to be entirely resorbed by the patients' body after fulfilling their task as a scaffold. This makes a second intervention (e.g. for implant removal) redundant and significantly enhances a patient's post-operative life quality. At the moment, materials for resorbable and biodegradable implants (e.g. polylactic acid or poly-caprolactone polymers) are still intensively studied. They are able to provide mandatory demands such as mechanical strength and attributes needed for high-quality implants. Implants, however, not only need to be made of adequate material, but must also to be personalized in order to meet the customers' needs. Combining three dimensional-printing and high-resolution imaging technologies a new age of implant production comes into sight. Three dimensional images (e.g. magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) of tissue defects can be utilized as digital blueprints for personalized implants. Modern additive manufacturing devices are able to use a variety of materials to fabricate custom parts within short periods of time. The combination of high-quality resorbable materials and personalized three dimensional-printing for the custom application will provide the patients with the best suitable and sustainable implants. In this study, we evaluated and compared four resorbable and three dimensional printable materials for their in vitro biocompatibility, in vitro rate of degradation, cell adherence and behavior on these materials as well as support of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. The tests were conducted with model constructs of 1 cm 2 surface area fabricated with fused deposition modeling three dimensional-printing technology. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of biomaterials applications. Volume 33:Number 2(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of biomaterials applications
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Number 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0033-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 281
- Page End:
- 294
- Publication Date:
- 2018-08
- Subjects:
- Additive manufacturing -- in vitro biocompatibility -- in vitro degradation -- mesenchymal stem cells -- non-permanent implants -- osteogenic differentiation -- RESOMERS® -- resorbable polymers
Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals
Biomedical materials -- Periodicals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://jba.sagepub.com ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0885328218787219 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0885-3282
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8513.xml