A pilot study of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and cardiac stress positron emission tomography before major non‐cardiac surgery1. (3rd October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ferguson, M. T.; Hofman, M. S.; Ismail, H.; Melville, A.; Yap, K. S. K.; Hicks, R. J.; Wright, S.; Riedel, B.
• Is Part Of: Anaesthesia. Volume 73:Number 12(2018)
• Page Start: 1524
• Page End: 1530
• Publication Date: 2018-10-03
• Subjects: cardiac morbidity: pre‐operative factors -- old MI: pre‐operative risk assessment -- peri‐operative risk of MI; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.96
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.14447
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-2409

Abstract

Summary: Cardiac events are a common cause of peri‐operative morbidity. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can objectively assess risk, but it does not quantify myocardial ischaemia. With appropriate dietary preparation to suppress basal myocardial glucose uptake, positron emission tomography with 18 F‐fluorodeoxyglucose can identify post‐ischaemic myocardium, providing an attractive complement to exercise testing. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of this diagnostic algorithm. Patients referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing before major cancer surgery were prospectively recruited. Exercise testing and positron emission tomography imaging were performed after a high fat–low carbohydrate meal. Protocol feasibility (primary end‐point) included compliance with pre‐test diet instructions and the completion of tests. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging was performed if either exercise testing or positron emission tomography was equivocal or positive for ischaemia. We recorded cardiac complications for 30 postoperative days. We enrolled 26 participants, 20 of whom completed protocol. Twenty‐one participants proceeded to surgery: myocardial injury or infarction was diagnosed in three participants, two of whom had positive or equivocal positron emission tomography but negative myocardial perfusion imaging. We have shown that pre‐operative cardiac positron emission tomography after cardiopulmonary exercise testing is feasible; protocol deviations were minor and did not affect image quality. Our findings warrant further investigation to compare the diagnostic utility of cardiac positron emission tomography imaging with standard pre‐operative stress tests.