Sublingual immunotherapy for pediatric allergic conjunctivitis: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Issue 11 (21st May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Jie; Zhang, Li; Zhao, Zhixiang; Liao, Shiyu
• Is Part Of: International forum of allergy & rhinology. Volume 8:Issue 11(2018:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1253
• Page End: 1259
• Publication Date: 2018-05-21
• Subjects: sublingual immunotherapy -- pediatric -- allergy -- conjunctivitis -- meta‐analysis; 617.51005
• DOI: 10.1002/alr.22149
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2042-6976

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a common chronic condition, especially in children. Ocular symptoms are often overlooked during treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). Pediatric ARC can be effectively treated using sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), which is a guideline‐recommended safe treatment approach. However, the therapeutic efficacy of SLIT in terms of ameliorating eye symptoms has not been effectively evaluated. Methods: We performed a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of SLIT for infants, children, and adolescents (aged from 3 to 18 years) with AC or ARC. We searched the Cochrane Library database, EMBASE, and Medline from November 1990 to 2017 to find papers dealing with the effects of SLIT on pediatric AC or ARC. We used standardized mean differences (SMDs) to assess therapeutic effects, employing a random effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. The I 2 metric was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results: In total, 13 clinical RCTs were included in our meta‐analysis. SLIT reduced ocular symptoms to a level below that of controls (SMD = −0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.41 to −0.01; p = 0.04; I 2 = 55%). Notably, on subgroup analysis, SLIT clearly reduced pollen‐induced pediatric AC (SMD = −0.36; 95% CI, −0.53 to −0.19; p < 0.0001; I 2 = 25%) but not mite‐induced AC (SMD = 0.20; 95% CI, −0.20 to 0.60; p = 0.34; I 2 = 46%). Conclusion: SLIT relieved ocular symptoms in children with ARC or AC. To confirm these results, future meta‐analyses should evaluate high‐quality, large‐scale population‐based trials.