Predictors of Unsuccessful Outcome in Cemented Femoral Revisions Using Bone Impaction Grafting; Cox Regression Analysis of 208 Cases. Issue 5 (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: te Stroet, Martijn A.J.; Rijnen, Wim H.C.; Gardeniers, Jean W.M.; Schreurs, B. Willem; Hannink, Gerjon
• Is Part Of: Hip international. Volume 26:Issue 5(2016)
• Page Start: 444
• Page End: 450
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Bone impaction grafting -- Cemented femoral component -- Cox regression analysis -- Revision total hip arthroplasty -- Unsuccessful outcome; Hip joint -- Pathophysiology -- Periodicals; Hip joint -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Hip joint -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.581005
• DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000370
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-7000

Abstract

Introduction: Despite improvements in the technique of femoral impaction bone grafting, reconstruction failures still can occur. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine risk factors for the endpoint re-revision for any reason. Methods: We used prospectively collected demographic, clinical and surgical data of all 202 patients who underwent 208 femoral revisions using the X-change Femoral Revision System (Stryker-Howmedica), fresh-frozen morcellised allograft and a cemented polished Exeter stem in our department from 1991 to 2007. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify potential factors associated with re-revision. Results: The mean follow-up was 10.6 (5-21) years. The cumulative re-revision rate was 6.3% (13/208). After univariable selection, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, type of removed femoral component, and mesh used for reconstruction were included in multivariable regression analysis. In the multivariable analysis, BMI was the only factor that was significantly associated with the risk of re-revision after bone impaction grafting (BMI ≥30 vs. BMI <30, HR = 6.54 [95% CI 1.89-22.65]; p = 0.003). Conclusions: BMI was the only factor associated with the risk of re-revision for any reason. Besides BMI also other factors, such as Endoklinik score and the type of removed femoral component, can provide guidance in the process of preclinical decision making. With the knowledge obtained from this study, pre-operative patient selection, informed consent, and treatment protocols can be better adjusted to the individual patient who needs to undergo a femoral revision with impaction bone grafting.