Operative Management of Unstable Radial Head Fractures in a Young Active Population. (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kusnezov, Nicholas; Eisenstein, Emmanuel; Dunn, John C.; Fares, Austin; Mitchell, Justin; Kilcoyne, Kelly; Waterman, Brian R.
• Is Part Of: Hand. Volume 13:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: 473
• Page End: 480
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: radial head fracture -- radial head arthroplasty -- open reduction with internal fixation -- functional outcomes -- complications -- reoperation; Hand -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Hand -- Surgery; Periodicals; 617.57005
• DOI: 10.1177/1558944717715136
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1558-9447

Abstract

Background: Radial head and neck fractures are the most common elbow fracture in the general adult population; however, the optimal treatment for radial head fractures remains a topic of ongoing clinical controversy. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of return to function, complications, and reoperation following operative management of unstable radial head fractures in a young, active patient population with intense upper extremity demands.Methods: A military health care database was queried for all US military servicemembers undergoing open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code: 24665) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA; CPT code: 24666) between 2010 and 2015. All patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Univariate and chi-square analyses were performed to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and the primary outcome measures.Results: A total of 67 ORIF (n = 69 elbows) and 10 RHA patients were included. The average age was 31 ± 8.0 years. At mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 1.1 years, 90% of patients overall were able to return to active military service, 96% of which with unrestricted upper extremity function. Nearly one-third (31.2%) of patients developed at least 1 postoperative complication. RHA has higher overall complication rates (70% vs 48%) when compared with ORIF, but this finding did not reach statistical significance ( P = .073). However, RHA had significantly higher rates of implant failure (20% vs 2.9%, P = .0498). Seventeen (21%) individuals required reoperation, 5 of which (6.3%) were revision procedures. Dislocation, coronoid fracture, and concomitant ligamentous repair portended a significantly increased risk of sustaining 1 or more complications ( P < .05), while dislocation and requirement for ligamentous repair independently predicted revision surgery ( P < .05).Conclusions: Arthroplasty and ORIF are both viable options for treating unstable radial head fractures in a young, athletic population, offering comparable return to function despite increased complications with RHA.