Cross‐sectional survey of biosimilar insulin utilization in Asia: The Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation Program. Issue 6 (24th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gani, Linsey; Lau, Eric; Luk, Andrea; Sobrepena, Leorino; Tran, Quang Khanh; Kesavadev, Jothydev; Jia, Weiping; Yu, Weinan; Tsang, Chiu Chi; Mukhopadhyay, Monojitketan; Jha, Sujeet; Sheu, Wayne; Ho, Yoon Kun; Nguyen, Thy Khue; Ozaki, Risa; So, Wing Yee; Kwan, Christine; Fu, Amy W C; Mirasol, Roberto; Phatak, Sanjeev Ratnakar; Kumar, Kanakatte Mylariah Prasanna; Aravind, Sosale; Janakiraman, Hari; Chan, Juliana C N
• Is Part Of: Journal of diabetes investigation. Volume 9:Issue 6(2018)
• Page Start: 1312
• Page End: 1322
• Publication Date: 2018-04-24
• Subjects: Asia -- Biosimilar -- Insulin; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Diabetes -- Research -- Periodicals; Diabetes Mellitus -- Periodicals; 616.462005
• DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12843
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2040-1116

Abstract

Abstract: Aims/Introduction: Biosimilar insulin can reduce treatment costs, although the extent of its use is largely unknown. We examined biosimilar insulin use and its associations with the quality of glycemic control using the Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation register. Materials and Methods: We carried out a cross‐sectional analysis in 81, 531 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes enrolled into the Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation Program from 2007 to 2014. All insulin related terms are extracted from the Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation portal, and compared clinical profiles between biosimilar and originator insulin users. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the association of biosimilar insulin compared with originator insulin with dosage, glycated hemoglobin and hypoglycemia events. Results: Amongst 81, 531 patients, 20.5% ( n = 16, 738) were insulin‐treated. In four countries with high use of biosimilar insulin, 4.7% ( n = 719) of insulin users ( n = 10, 197) were treated with biosimilar insulin (India n = 507, 70.3%; the Philippines n = 90, 12.5%; China n = 62, 8.6%; Vietnam n = 60, 8.3%). Biosimilar insulin users were younger and had higher body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, insulin dosage and more frequent hypoglycemia than originator insulin users. These associations were non‐significant after adjustment for confounders. Only age, college education, diabetes education, lipid control, physical activity and history of cardiovascular complications were independently associated with these quality measures. Conclusions: Biosimilar insulin use is not uncommon in Asia. Data exclusion due to incomplete capturing of brand names suggests possibly higher use. The multiple determinants of the quality of glycemic control call for establishment of prospective cohorts and diabetes registers to monitor the safety and efficacy of different brands of biosimilar insulin and their impacts on clinical outcomes. Abstract : Biosimilar insulin utilisation is increasing in Asia. We examine the usage of biosimilar insulin in clinical practice from the JADE program to assess the association of biosimilar insulin use with insulin dose, HbA1c and hypoglycaemia events.