Comparing capability of scenario hazard identification methods by the PIC (Plant-People-Procedure Interaction Contribution) network metric. (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Seligmann, Benjamin J.; Zhao, Jiayi; Marmara, Sophia G.; Corbett, Tayla C.; Small, Michael; Hassall, Maureen; Boadle, Jesse T.
• Is Part Of: Safety science. Volume 112(2019)
• Page Start: 116
• Page End: 129
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Hazard identification -- Network -- Accident -- Complexity -- Socio-technical; Industrial accidents -- Periodicals; Accident Prevention -- Periodicals; Safety -- Periodicals; Travail -- Accidents -- Périodiques; 363.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0925-7535

Abstract

Highlights: A network theoretic metric for comparing HAZID methods was presented. The metric counts socio-technical interactions in accident scenarios. The metric is called the P3 Interaction Contribution (PIC). The PIC results showed clear differences in HAZID results. Future experiments to validate the PIC were presented. Abstract: Comparing the results of hazard identification (HAZID) methods is a complex task, but the question that drives this activity is vitally important: which HAZID method should be used to best identify an accident scenario? Despite many efforts to address this, effective metrics do not yet readily exist for clearly comparing HAZID results for a particular scenario. The complexity of socio-technical systems is often cited as a key factor that limits effective scenario identification, calling into question traditional HAZID efforts. Motivated by the observation that interactions between multiple component types, such as People, Plant and Procedures (P3), often significantly contribute to major process system accidents, being an expression of the complexity of the system, a novel, precise, network topology-based metric for calculating the contribution of P3 Interactions to accident scenarios is presented. This metric, called the P3 Interaction Contribution (PIC), is intended to be used for comparing the HAZID results. An illustrative example of using the PIC for HAZID comparison is included, whereby Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Blended Hazard Identification methodology (BLHAZID) and Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) were each applied to a heat exchanger start-up operation. The results show initial promise that the PIC can be effective as a HAZID comparison tool. The main outputs of this paper are the presentation of the PIC calculation process and the method for applying the PIC to HAZID results. The paper concludes with recommendations for further experimental work to explore the validation and assess the true value of the PIC.