IRT Models for Expert-Coded Panel Data. (3rd September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marquardt, Kyle L.; Pemstein, Daniel
• Is Part Of: Political analysis. Volume 26:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: 431
• Page End: 456
• Publication Date: 2018-09-03
• Subjects: Bayesian methods, -- expert opinion, -- latent variables, -- IRT models, -- cross-national data; Political science -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 320.011
• DOI: 10.1017/pan.2018.28
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1047-1987

Abstract

Abstract : Data sets quantifying phenomena of social-scientific interest often use multiple experts to code latent concepts. While it remains standard practice to report the average score across experts, experts likely vary in both their expertise and their interpretation of question scales. As a result, the mean may be an inaccurate statistic. Item-response theory (IRT) models provide an intuitive method for taking these forms of expert disagreement into account when aggregating ordinal ratings produced by experts, but they have rarely been applied to cross-national expert-coded panel data. We investigate the utility of IRT models for aggregating expert-coded data by comparing the performance of various IRT models to the standard practice of reporting average expert codes, using both data from the V-Dem data set and ecologically motivated simulated data. We find that IRT approaches outperform simple averages when experts vary in reliability and exhibit differential item functioning (DIF). IRT models are also generally robust even in the absence of simulated DIF or varying expert reliability. Our findings suggest that producers of cross-national data sets should adopt IRT techniques to aggregate expert-coded data measuring latent concepts.