The effectiveness of using diversity to select multiple classifier systems with varying classification thresholds. Issue 3 (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Butler, Harris K; Friend, Mark A; Bauer, Kenneth W; Bihl, Trevor J
• Is Part Of: Journal of algorithms & computational technology. Volume 12:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 187
• Page End: 199
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: Accuracy -- classifier fusion -- classification threshold -- classification -- diversity -- ensembles; Computer algorithms -- Periodicals; Numerical calculations -- Periodicals; Computer algorithms; Numerical calculations; Periodicals; 518.1
• DOI: 10.1177/1748301818761132
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-3018

Abstract

In classification applications, the goal of fusion techniques is to exploit complementary approaches and merge the information provided by these methods to provide a solution superior than any single method. Associated with choosing a methodology to fuse pattern recognition algorithms is the choice of algorithm or algorithms to fuse. Historically, classifier ensemble accuracy has been used to select which pattern recognition algorithms are included in a multiple classifier system. More recently, research has focused on creating and evaluating diversity metrics to more effectively select ensemble members. Using a wide range of classification data sets, methodologies, and fusion techniques, current diversity research is extended by expanding classifier domains before employing fusion methodologies. The expansion is made possible with a unique classification score algorithm developed for this purpose. Correlation and linear regression techniques reveal that the relationship between diversity metrics and accuracy is tenuous and optimal ensemble selection should be based on ensemble accuracy. The strengths and weaknesses of popular diversity metrics are examined in the context of the information they provide with respect to changing classification thresholds and accuracies.