Accuracy of electrical aerosol sensors measuring lung deposited surface area concentrations. (November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Todea, Ana Maria; Beckmann, Stefanie; Kaminski, Heinz; Asbach, Christof
• Is Part Of: Journal of aerosol science. Volume 89(2015:Nov.)
• Page Start: 96
• Page End: 109
• Publication Date: 2015-11
• Subjects: Lung deposited surface area concentration -- Accuracy -- Diffusion chargers -- Monodisperse particles; Aerosols -- Periodicals; Aerosols -- Periodicals; Aérosols -- Périodiques; 541.34515
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.07.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8502

Abstract

Abstract: The accuracy of instruments measuring the alveolar lung deposited surface area (LDSA) concentration based on unipolar diffusion charging has been assessed. Monodisperse particles with sizes between 10 nm and 700 nm were used. The results indicate that the LDSA concentration can be measured with at least ±30% accuracy for particle sizes between 20 nm and 400 nm. The LDSA concentrations of particles <20 nm are overestimated and of particles >400 nm increasingly underestimated by the instruments. The LDSA concentration of 685 nm particles was on average underreported by a factor of approximately 2. LDSA concentrations measured with agglomerated particles were consistently higher than those measured with spherical particles of the same electrical mobility diameter. The accuracy was, however, still mostly within ±30% for a size range from 20 nm to 400 nm. Due to the strong and increasing deviation for large particles, the use of an appropriate preseprator is recommended when measuring LDSA concentrations. Highlights: The accuracy of measuring lung deposited surface area concentrations has been assessed. Measurements were conducted with monodisperse particles between 10 nm and 700 nm. Highest accuracy around of ±30% or better for particle sizes between 20 nm and 400 nm. Concentrations of particles <20 nm are significantly overestimated. Concentrations of particles >400 nm are significantly underestimated.