Simulated impacts of climate change on water use and yield of irrigated sugarcane in South Africa. (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jones, M.R.; Singels, A.; Ruane, A.C.
• Is Part Of: Agricultural systems. Volume 139(2015)
• Page Start: 260
• Page End: 270
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Climate change -- Model -- Cane yield -- Irrigation requirement -- Water use; Agricultural systems -- Periodicals; Agriculture -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 338.16
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-521X

Abstract

Abstract: Reliable predictions of climate change impacts on water use, irrigation requirements and yields of irrigated sugarcane in South Africa (a water-scarce country) are necessary to plan adaptation strategies. Although previous work has been done in this regard, methodologies and results vary considerably. The objectives were (1) to estimate likely impacts of climate change on sugarcane yields, water use and irrigation demand at three irrigated sugarcane production sites in South Africa (Malelane, Pongola and La Mercy) for current (1980–2010) and future (2070–2100) climate scenarios, using an approach based on the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) protocols; and (2) to assess the suitability of this methodology for investigating climate change impacts on sugarcane production. Future climate datasets were generated using the Delta downscaling method and three Global Circulation Models (GCMs) assuming atmospheric CO2 concentration [ CO2 ] of 734 ppm (A2 emissions scenario). Yield and water use were simulated using the DSSAT-Canegro v4.5 model. Irrigated cane yields are expected to increase at all three sites (between 11 and 14%), primarily due to increased interception of radiation as a result of accelerated canopy development. Evapotranspiration and irrigation requirements increased by 11% due to increased canopy cover and evaporative demand. Sucrose yields are expected to decline because of increased consumption of photo-assimilate for structural growth and maintenance respiration. Crop responses in canopy development and yield formation differed markedly between the crop cycles investigated. Possible agronomic implications of these results include reduced weed control costs due to shortened periods of partial canopy, a need for improved efficiency of irrigation to counter increased demands, and adjustments to ripening and harvest practices to counter decreased cane quality and optimise productivity. Although the Delta climate data downscaling method is considered robust, accurate and easily-understood, it does not change the future number of rain-days per month. The impacts of this and other climate data simplifications ought to be explored in future work. Shortcomings of the DSSAT-Canegro model include the simulated responses of phenological development, photosynthesis and respiration processes to high temperatures, and the disconnect between simulated biomass accumulation and expansive growth. Proposed methodology refinements should improve the reliability of predicted climate change impacts on sugarcane yield. Highlights: Climate change is likely to increase sugarcane yields in South Africa by 11%. Climate change is likely to reduce cane quality and sucrose yields. Sugarcane irrigation requirement is projected to increase by 11%. Yield and irrigation changes are driven by accelerated canopy development. Adaptations could include more efficient irrigation technology, reduced harvest age. DSSAT-Canegro canopy development responses to climate change require improvement.