Evaluation of the preference, satisfaction and correct use of Breezhaler® and Respimat® inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – INHALATOR study. (November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of the preference, satisfaction and correct use of Breezhaler® and Respimat® inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – INHALATOR study. (November 2018)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of the preference, satisfaction and correct use of Breezhaler® and Respimat® inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – INHALATOR study
- Authors:
- Oliveira, Maria Vera Cruz de
Pizzichini, Emilio
da Costa, Claudia Henrique
Fritscher, Carlos Cezar
Vianna, Elcio Oliveira
Teixeira, Paulo José Zimermann
Stirbulov, Roberto
Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad
Pinho, Nadine Cordeiro de - Abstract:
- Abstract: The INHALATOR study was a randomized, multicentre, open label, two-period of 7 days each, crossover study, with 7 days of washout in-between, aiming to evaluate the correct use, satisfaction and preference between Breezhaler ® and Respimat ® devices in patients under daily use of open Spiriva ® or open Onbrize ®, as monotherapy for treatment of mild or moderate COPD. Patients aged ≥40 years with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-year were included in the study. Primary endpoint was the rate of correct use of each device at the first day of treatment after reading the drug leaflet information and was evaluated under the supervision of a trained evaluator. At the end of each treatment phase, the inhaler use was re-evaluated and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed. The patients' preference for the inhaler devices was assessed at the end of the study. After exclusions due to screening failures, 140 patients were randomized: 136 received at least one dose of Breezhaler ® and 135 of Respimat ® . At treatment start, the rate of correct inhaler use was 40.4% (95%CI: 32.2%–48.7%) for Breezhaler ® and 36.3% (95%CI: 28.2%–44.4%) for Respimat ® (p = 0.451). After 7 days, the rates were 68.9% (95%CI: 61.1%–76.7%) and 60.4% (95%CI: 52.2%–68.7%), respectively (p = 0.077). According to the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler Questionnaire - FSI 10 patients were more satisfied using Breezhaler ® than Respimat ® and 57.1% preferred using Breezhaler ® (p = 0.001) whileAbstract: The INHALATOR study was a randomized, multicentre, open label, two-period of 7 days each, crossover study, with 7 days of washout in-between, aiming to evaluate the correct use, satisfaction and preference between Breezhaler ® and Respimat ® devices in patients under daily use of open Spiriva ® or open Onbrize ®, as monotherapy for treatment of mild or moderate COPD. Patients aged ≥40 years with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-year were included in the study. Primary endpoint was the rate of correct use of each device at the first day of treatment after reading the drug leaflet information and was evaluated under the supervision of a trained evaluator. At the end of each treatment phase, the inhaler use was re-evaluated and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed. The patients' preference for the inhaler devices was assessed at the end of the study. After exclusions due to screening failures, 140 patients were randomized: 136 received at least one dose of Breezhaler ® and 135 of Respimat ® . At treatment start, the rate of correct inhaler use was 40.4% (95%CI: 32.2%–48.7%) for Breezhaler ® and 36.3% (95%CI: 28.2%–44.4%) for Respimat ® (p = 0.451). After 7 days, the rates were 68.9% (95%CI: 61.1%–76.7%) and 60.4% (95%CI: 52.2%–68.7%), respectively (p = 0.077). According to the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler Questionnaire - FSI 10 patients were more satisfied using Breezhaler ® than Respimat ® and 57.1% preferred using Breezhaler ® (p = 0.001) while 30.1% preferred Respimat ® (p < 0.001). Highlights: A majority of the patients preferred the Breezhaler ® over Respimat ® . Patients showed a higher satisfaction with Breezhaler ® compared with the Respimat ® . A high prevalence of inappropriate use of the devices was observed in both groups. There was no difference between the patients who did not make critical errors. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Respiratory medicine. Volume 144(2018)
- Journal:
- Respiratory medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 144(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 144, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 144
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0144-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 61
- Page End:
- 67
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11
- Subjects:
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease -- Patient preference -- Patient satisfaction -- Administration -- Inhaler preference -- Inhaler device
Chest -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Chest -- Diseases -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiratory Tract Diseases -- Periodicals
Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Périodiques
Thorax -- Maladies -- Périodiques
Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09546111 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09546111 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09546111 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0954-6111
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7777.661900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8395.xml