An International Perspective on the Tools and Concepts for Effluent Toxicity Assessments in the Context of Animal Alternatives: Reduction in Vertebrate Use. (25th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Norberg‐King, Teresa J.; Embry, Michelle R.; Belanger, Scott E.; Braunbeck, Thomas; Butler, Joshua D.; Dorn, Phil B.; Farr, Brianna; Guiney, Patrick D.; Hughes, Sarah A.; Jeffries, Marlo; Journel, Romain; Lèonard, Marc; McMaster, Mark; Oris, James T.; Ryder, Kathy; Segner, Helmut; Senac, Thomas; Van Der Kraak, Glen; Whale, Graham; Wilson, Peter
• Is Part Of: Environmental toxicology and chemistry. Volume 37:Number 11(2018)
• Page Start: 2745
• Page End: 2757
• Publication Date: 2018-10-25
• Subjects: Effluent testing -- Animal alternatives -- Regulation -- Weight of evidence -- Toxicity testing -- Wastewater; Pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental chemistry -- Periodicals; 615.902
• DOI: 10.1002/etc.4259
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0730-7268

Abstract

Abstract: Since the 1940s, effluent toxicity testing has been used to assess potential ecological impacts of effluents and help determine necessary treatment options for environmental protection prior to release. Strategic combinations of toxicity tests, analytical tools, and biological monitoring have been developed. Because the number of vertebrates utilized in effluent testing is thought to be much greater than that used for individual chemical testing, there is a new need to develop strategies to reduce the numbers of vertebrates (i.e., fish) used. This need will become more critical as developing nations begin to use vertebrates in toxicity tests to assess effluent quality. A workshop was held to 1) assess the state of science in effluent toxicity testing globally; 2) determine current practices of regulators, industry, private laboratories, and academia; and 3) explore alternatives to vertebrate (fish) testing options and the inclusion of modified/new methods and approaches in the regulatory environment. No single approach was identified, because of a range of factors including regulatory concerns, validity criteria, and wider acceptability of alternatives. However, a suite of strategies in a weight‐of‐evidence approach would provide the flexibility to meet the needs of the environment, regulators, and the regulated community; and this "toolbox" approach would also support reduced reliance on in vivo fish tests. The present Focus article provides a brief overview of wastewater regulation and effluent testing approaches. Alternative methodologies under development and some of the limitations and barriers to regulatory approaches that can be selected to suit individual country and regional requirements are described and discussed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2745–2757. © 2018 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.