Perceptions of Equipoise, Risk–Benefit Ratios, and "Otherwise Healthy Volunteers" in the Context of Early-Phase HIV Cure Research in the United States: A Qualitative Inquiry. (February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dubé, Karine; Dee, Lynda; Evans, David; Sylla, Laurie; Taylor, Jeff; Brown, Brandon; Miller, Veronica; Corneli, Amy; Skinner, Asheley; Greene, Sandra B.; Tucker, Joseph D.; Rennie, Stuart
• Is Part Of: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics. Volume 13:Number 1(2018)
• Page Start: 3
• Page End: 17
• Publication Date: 2018-02
• Subjects: equipoise -- risk–benefit ratios -- "otherwise healthy volunteers" -- HIV cure research -- United States; Medical ethics -- Research -- Periodicals; Research -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; 174.205
• DOI: 10.1177/1556264617734061
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1556-2646

Abstract

Early-phase HIV cure research is conducted against a background of highly effective antiretroviral therapy, and involves risky interventions in individuals who enjoy an almost normal life expectancy. To explore perceptions of three ethical topics in the context of HIV cure research—(a) equipoise, (b) risk–benefit ratios, and (c) "otherwise healthy volunteers"—we conducted 36 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with three groups of purposively selected key informants: clinician-researchers ( n = 11), policy-makers and bioethicists ( n = 13), and people living with HIV (PLWHIV; n = 12). Our analysis revealed variability in perceptions of equipoise. Second, most key informants believed there was no clear measure of risk–benefit ratios in HIV cure research, due in part to the complexity of weighing (sometimes unknown) risks to participants and (sometimes speculative) benefits to science and society. Third, most clinician-researchers and policy-makers/bioethicists viewed potential HIV cure study participants as "otherwise healthy volunteers, " but this perception was not shared among PLWHIV in our study.