A global meta‐analysis of marine predator nitrogen stable isotopes: Relationships between trophic structure and environmental conditions. Issue 9 (30th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pethybridge, Heidi; Choy, C. Anela; Logan, John M.; Allain, Valerie; Lorrain, Anne; Bodin, Nathalie; Somes, Christopher J.; Young, Jock; Ménard, Frederic; Langlais, Clothilde; Duffy, Leanne; Hobday, Alistair J.; Kuhnert, Petra; Fry, Brian; Menkes, Christophe; Olson, Robert J.
• Is Part Of: Global ecology & biogeography. Volume 27:Issue 9(2018)
• Page Start: 1043
• Page End: 1055
• Publication Date: 2018-08-30
• Subjects: albacore tuna -- bigeye tuna -- biological oceanography -- food webs -- macroecology -- oxygen minimum zone -- trophodynamics -- yellowfin tuna; Ecology -- Periodicals; Biogeography -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Macroevolution -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/geb.12763
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1466-822X

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: We examined potential environmental drivers of broad‐scale spatial patterns in the trophic structure of marine ecosystems as represented by nitrogen stable isotopes in globally distributed marine predators. Additionally, we assessed the effects of spatial scale on the predictive capabilities of environmental variables. Location: Global oceans. Time period: 2000 to 2015. Major taxa studied: Tunas: Thunnus albacares, Thunnus obesus, Thunnus alalunga . Methods: We undertook a global compilation and meta‐analysis of the bulk nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ 15 N values) of three tuna species ( n = 4, 281). After adjusting for regional variations in baseline δ 15 N values using a global ocean biogeochemistry model, generalized additive mixed models were employed to infer global‐scale oceanographic controls of trophic structure, using cosmopolitan tuna species as a model. Results: For the three tuna species, variation in trophic position estimated using bulk δ 15 N values was largely explained by geographical location and the corresponding oxygen minimum layer depth. Tuna trophic positions declined in areas with reduced oxygen at depth. Food‐chain length, as captured by maximum trophic position, was longer in areas of the western Pacific Ocean and shorter in the northern Atlantic and eastern Pacific Oceans. Trophic adaptability of the tuna predators, as indicated by intraspecific variability, was highest in the western and central Pacific Ocean and lowest in the northern Atlantic Ocean. Our analysis demonstrated that while tunas share similar functional trophic roles, deeper‐foraging tuna species had higher trophic positions globally. The predictive capacity of environmental variables decreased at finer (regional) spatial scales. Main conclusions: Our work suggests that habitat compression resulting from the predicted global expansion of oxygen minimum zones with ocean warming will impact the trophic structure of marine food webs and the corresponding foraging habits of marine predators. Spatial scale analyses highlighted the importance of representing differences in regional ecological dynamics in global‐scale trophic and ecosystem models.