From peacekeepers to praetorians – how participating in peacekeeping operations may subvert democracy. (June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cunliffe, Philip
• Is Part Of: International relations. Volume 32:Number 2(2018)
• Page Start: 218
• Page End: 239
• Publication Date: 2018-06
• Subjects: Bangladesh -- coup -- Fiji -- Gambia -- military -- peacekeeping; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 303.482
• DOI: 10.1177/0047117817740728
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0047-1178

Abstract

This article provides a heuristic study of three cases where participation in peacekeeping operations prompted military rule in the peacekeeper-contributing state. These three atypical cases contradict the theory of diversionary peace, which claims that contributing to peacekeeping operations abroad should stimulate democracy at home. The experience of these three countries also calls into question the conventional wisdom that strongly associates peacekeeping with liberal democratic institutions, outcomes and practices. Via triangulation across literature, reports, elite interviews and WikiLeaks cables, these cases are examined in order to identify more generalisable observations regarding how participation in peacekeeping may enhance the role of the military at the expense of democratic order and civilian rule in the contributing state. The theory of diversionary peace is shown to suffer from serious conceptual flaws. Some preliminary efforts are made to generalise the findings, with Ghana and Uruguay identified as warranting further investigation. A number of variables are identified as offering scope for generalisation, namely, revenue, leadership and military size. Several promising areas for further research are also identified: how military dependence on peacekeeping may make political systems more permeable to outside influence, how far the United Nations (UN) can politically influence its contributor states and how peacebuilding may affect peacekeepers' understanding of their role in their own countries. By examining the feedback effects of peacekeeping on peacekeeper-contributing states, the article reverses the conventional focus of peacekeeping scholarship and contributes to the growing literature examining the wider ramifications and unintended consequences of liberal conflict management.