Brain-brain integration in 2035: metaphysical and ethical implications. Issue 3 (10th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hongladarom, Soraj
• Editors: Bernd Carsten Stahl, Prof. Charles M Ess, Prof.
• Is Part Of: Journal of information, communication & ethics in society. Volume 13:Issue 3/4(2015)
• Page Start: 205
• Page End: 217
• Publication Date: 2015-08-10
• Subjects: Privacy -- Computer ethics -- Robotics -- Bioethics -- Human values; Information technology -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; Information society -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; Information superhighway -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Digital media -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Digital communications -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Computer networks -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Computer security -- Periodicals; 303.4833
• DOI: 10.1108/JICES-10-2014-0042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-996X

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this study is to think ahead into the year 2035 and reflect on the ethical implications of brain-to-brain linking. Design/methodology/approach: – Philosophical argument. Findings: – It is quite likely that the direction of technological research today is heading toward a closer integration of mind and machine in 2035. What is interesting is that the integration also makes mind-mind or brain-brain integration possible too. There is nothing in principle that would prevent hooking up more than one brain to a machine, or connecting two or more brains together to harness their processing power to tackle a very complicated task. If that happens, the whole notion of what it is to be an individual and a self will have to be rethought. I have offered a way in which that can be done: Instead of viewing the self as being contained in a closed space traditionally defined by the skin, the self can expand outside of the skin and merge temporarily with other selves too. This also has profound implications on the notion of privacy, especially on how it is conceptualized and justified. Research limitations/implications: – This research is limited to theoretical argumentation only. It relies on the current empirical and scientific investigations that are going on at the moment and provide ethical reflections on them. Practical implications: – We need to anticipate technological innovations to be more proactive in deliberating and formulating policy and ethical guidelines; otherwise, ethicists will just muse after the fact, implying that there is nothing further to be done. Social implications: – Brain-to-brain linking has tremendous social implications, so is the ethical reflection on the issue. Originality/value: – Argument purporting to show the specific content in ethical guidelines on brain-to-brain interlinking based on the metaphysics of the self that is directly implicated by the technology has not been done before, according to the author's best knowledge.