Psoas Versus Femoral Blocks: A Registry Analysis of Risks and Benefits. Issue 6 (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bomberg, Hagen; Huth, Andrea; Wagenpfeil, Stefan; Kessler, Paul; Wulf, Hinnerk; Standl, Thomas; Gottschalk, André; Döffert, Jens; Hering, Werner; Birnbaum, Jürgen; Spies, Claudia; Kutter, Bernd; Winckelmann, Jörg; Burgard, Gerald; Vicent, Oliver; Koch, Thea; Sessler, Daniel I.; Volk, Thomas; Raddatz, Alexander
• Is Part Of: Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Volume 42:Issue 6(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Conduction anesthesia -- Periodicals; Pain medicine -- Periodicals; 617.964
• DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000643
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1098-7339

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objectives: Psoas blocks are an alternative to femoral nerve blocks and have the potential advantage of blocking the entire lumbar plexus. However, the psoas muscle is located deeply, making psoas blocks more difficult than femoral blocks. In contrast, while femoral blocks are generally easy to perform, the inguinal region is prone to infection. We thus tested the hypothesis that psoas blocks are associated with more insertion-related complications than femoral blocks but have fewer catheter-related infections. Methods: We extracted 22, 434 surgical cases from the German Network for Regional Anesthesia registry (2007–2014) and grouped cases as psoas (n = 7593) and femoral (n = 14, 841) blocks. Insertion-related complications (including single-shot blocks and catheter) and infectious complications (including only catheter) in each group were compared with χ 2 tests. The groups were compared with multivariable logistic models, adjusted for potential confounding factors. Results: After adjustment for potential confounding factors, psoas blocks were associated with more complications than femoral blocks including vascular puncture 6.3% versus 1.1%, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9–4.6; P < 0.001), and multiple skin punctures 12.6% versus 7.7%, with an aOR of 2.6 (95% CI, 2.1–3.3; P <0.001). Psoas blocks were also associated with fewer catheter-related infections: 0.3% versus 0.9% (aOR of 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = 0.016), and with improved patient satisfaction (mean ± SD 0- to 10-point scale score, 9.6 ± 1.2 vs 8.4 ± 2.9; P < 0.001). Results from a propensity-matched sensitivity analysis were similar. Conclusions: Psoas blocks are associated with more insertion-related complications but fewer infectious complications. Clinical Trial Registration: ID NCT02846610.