The association of surgical versus natural menopause with future left ventricular structure and function: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Issue 11 (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Appiah, Duke; Schreiner, Pamela J.; Nwabuo, Chike C.; Wellons, Melissa F.; Lewis, Cora E.; Lima, Joao A.
• Is Part Of: Menopause. Volume 24:Issue 11(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Echocardiography -- Epidemiology -- Left ventricles -- Menopause -- Women; Menopause -- Periodicals; 618.175005
• DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000919
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1072-3714

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the association between surgical menopause (SM) versus natural menopause (NM) in relation to later left ventricular (LV) structure and function, while taking into account the LV parameters and other cardiovascular disease risk factor (CVDRF) levels that predate the menopausal transition. Methods: We studied 825 premenopausal women from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study in 1990 to 1991 (baseline, mean age 32 years) who later reached menopause by 2010 to 2011 and had echocardiograms at these two time points. Results: During 20 years of follow-up, 508 women reached NM, whereas 317 underwent SM (34% had bilateral oophorectomy). At baseline, women who later underwent SM were more likely to be black, younger, have greater parity, and higher mean values of systolic blood pressure, body mass index, and also lower mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and physical activity than women who reached NM. No significant differences in LV structure/function were found between groups. In 2010 to 2011, SM women had significantly higher LV mass, LV mass/volume ratio, E/e' ratio, and impaired longitudinal and circumferential strain than NM women. SM women with bilateral oophorectomy had adverse LV measures than women with hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Controlling for baseline echocardiographic parameters and CVDRF in linear regression models eliminated these differences between groups. Further adjustment for age at menopause/surgery and hormone therapy use did not change these results. Conclusion: In this study, the adverse LV structure and function observed among women with SM compared with NM were explained by their unfavorable presurgical CVDRF profiles, suggesting that premenopausal CVDRF rather than gynecologic surgery predispose SM women to elevated future cardiovascular disease risk. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text