Technical Note: Intrafractional changes in time lag relationship between anterior–posterior external and superior–inferior internal motion signals in abdominal tumor sites. Issue 6 (15th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Regmi, Rajesh; Lovelock, D. Michael; Zhang, Pengpeng; Pham, Hai; Xiong, Jianping; Yorke, Ellen D.; Goodman, Karyn A.; Wu, Abraham J.; Mageras, Gig S.
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 42:Issue 6(2015)Part 1
• Page Start: 2813
• Page End: 2817
• Publication Date: 2015-05-15
• Subjects: cancer -- computerised tomography -- medical signal processing -- pneumodynamics -- radiation therapy -- tumours; Computed tomography -- Biological signal processing -- Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy -- Cancer; Computerised tomographs -- Radiation therapy -- Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications -- Image data processing or generation, in general; gated radiation therapy -- respiratory motion; Cancer -- Cone beam computed tomography -- Radiation treatment -- Medical imaging -- Lungs -- Radiation therapy -- Image sensors -- Pneumodynamics -- Image detection systems -- Liver; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4919446
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: To investigate constancy, within a treatment session, of the time lag relationship between implanted markers in abdominal tumors and an external motion surrogate. Methods: Six gastroesophageal junction and three pancreatic cancer patients (IRB‐approved protocol) received two cone‐beam CTs (CBCT), one before and one after treatment. Time between scans was less than 30 min. Each patient had at least one implanted fiducial marker near the tumor. In all scans, abdominal displacement (Varian RPM) was recorded as the external motion signal. Purpose‐built software tracked fiducials, representing internal signal, in CBCT projection images. Time lag between superior–inferior (SI) internal and anterior–posterior external signals was found by maximizing the correlation coefficient in each breathing cycle and averaging over all cycles. Time‐lag‐induced discrepancy between internal SI position and that predicted from the external signal (external prediction error) was also calculated. Results: Mean ± standard deviation time lag, over all scans and patients, was 0.10 ± 0.07 s (range 0.01–0.36 s). External signal lagged the internal in 17/18 scans. Change in time lag between pre‐ and post‐treatment CBCT was 0.06 ± 0.07 s (range 0.01–0.22 s), corresponding to 3.1% ± 3.7% (range 0.6%–10.8%) of gate width (range 1.6–3.1 s). In only one patient, change in time lag exceeded 10% of the gate width. External prediction error over all scans of all patients varied from 0.1 ± 0.1 to 1.6 ± 0.4 mm. Conclusions: Time lag between internal motion along SI and external signals is small compared to the treatment gate width of abdominal patients examined in this study. Change in time lag within a treatment session, inferred from pre‐ to post‐treatment measurements is also small, suggesting that a single measurement of time lag at the session start is adequate. These findings require confirmation in a larger number of patients.