Accuracy of self‐reported smoking abstinence in clinical trials of hospital‐initiated smoking interventions. (23rd August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Scheuermann, Taneisha S.; Richter, Kimber P.; Rigotti, Nancy A.; Cummins, Sharon E.; Harrington, Kathleen F.; Sherman, Scott E.; Zhu, Shu‐Hong; Tindle, Hilary A.; Preacher, Kristopher J.
• Is Part Of: Addiction. Volume 112:Number 12(2017)
• Page Start: 2227
• Page End: 2236
• Publication Date: 2017-08-23
• Subjects: Biochemical verification -- hospital patients -- saliva cotinine -- self‐report -- smoking cessation -- trials; Alcoholism -- Periodicals; Drug addiction -- Periodicals; 616.86
• DOI: 10.1111/add.13913
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0965-2140

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: To estimate the prevalence and predictors of failed biochemical verification of self‐reported abstinence among participants enrolled in trials of hospital‐initiated smoking cessation interventions. Design: Comparison of characteristics between participants who verified and those who failed to verify self‐reported abstinence. Settings: Multi‐site randomized clinical trials conducted between 2010 and 2014 in hospitals throughout the United States. Participants: Recently hospitalized smokers who reported tobacco abstinence 6 months post‐randomization and provided a saliva sample for verification purposes ( n = 822). Measurements: Outcomes were salivary cotinine‐verified smoking abstinence at 10 and 15 ng/ml cut‐points. Predictors and correlates included participant demographics and tobacco use; hospital diagnoses and treatment; and study characteristics collected via surveys and electronic medical records. Findings: Usable samples were returned by 69.8% of the 1178 eligible trial participants who reported 7‐day point prevalence abstinence. The proportion of participants verified as quit was 57.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 54.4, 61.2; 10 ng/ml cut‐off] or 60.6% (95% CI = 57.2, 63.9; 15 ng/ml). Factors associated independently with verification at 10 ng/ml were education beyond high school education [odds ratio (OR) = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.07, 2.11], continuous abstinence since hospitalization (OR = 2.82; 95% CI = 2.02, 3.94), mailed versus in‐person sample (OR = 3.20; 95% CI = 1.96, 5.21) and race. African American participants were less likely to verify abstinence than white participants (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.44, 0.93). Findings were similar for verification at 15 ng/ml. Verification rates did not differ by treatment group. Conclusions: In the United States, high rates (40%) of recently hospitalized smokers enrolled in smoking cessation trials fail biochemical verification of their self‐reported abstinence.