Network meta‐analysis of protocol‐driven care and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Issue 13 (20th October 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Network meta‐analysis of protocol‐driven care and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Issue 13 (20th October 2016)
- Main Title:
- Network meta‐analysis of protocol‐driven care and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
- Authors:
- Currie, A. C.
Malietzis, G.
Jenkins, J. T.
Yamada, T.
Ashrafian, H.
Athanasiou, T.
Okabayashi, K.
Kennedy, R. H. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Laparoscopic approaches and standardized recovery protocols have reduced morbidity following colorectal cancer surgery. As the optimal regimen remains inconclusive, a network meta‐analysis was undertaken of treatments for the development of postoperative complications and mortality. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, trial registries and related reviews were searched for randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery within protocol‐driven or conventional perioperative care for colorectal cancer resection, with complications as a defined endpoint. Relative odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative complications and mortality were estimated for aggregated data. Results: Forty trials reporting on 11 516 randomized patients were included with the network. Open surgery within conventional perioperative care was the index for comparison. The OR relating to complications was 0·77 (95 per cent c.i. 0·65 to 0·91) for laparoscopic surgery within conventional care, 0·69 (0·48 to 0·99) for open surgery within protocol‐driven care, and 0·43 (0·28 to 0·67) for laparoscopic surgery within protocol‐driven care. Sensitivity analyses excluding trials of low rectal cancer and those with a high risk of bias did not affect the treatment estimates. Meta‐analyses demonstrated that mortality risk was unaffected by perioperative strategy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery combined with protocol‐driven care reduces colorectal cancer surgery complications, but not mortality. TheAbstract: Background: Laparoscopic approaches and standardized recovery protocols have reduced morbidity following colorectal cancer surgery. As the optimal regimen remains inconclusive, a network meta‐analysis was undertaken of treatments for the development of postoperative complications and mortality. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, trial registries and related reviews were searched for randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery within protocol‐driven or conventional perioperative care for colorectal cancer resection, with complications as a defined endpoint. Relative odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative complications and mortality were estimated for aggregated data. Results: Forty trials reporting on 11 516 randomized patients were included with the network. Open surgery within conventional perioperative care was the index for comparison. The OR relating to complications was 0·77 (95 per cent c.i. 0·65 to 0·91) for laparoscopic surgery within conventional care, 0·69 (0·48 to 0·99) for open surgery within protocol‐driven care, and 0·43 (0·28 to 0·67) for laparoscopic surgery within protocol‐driven care. Sensitivity analyses excluding trials of low rectal cancer and those with a high risk of bias did not affect the treatment estimates. Meta‐analyses demonstrated that mortality risk was unaffected by perioperative strategy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery combined with protocol‐driven care reduces colorectal cancer surgery complications, but not mortality. The reduction in complications with protocol‐driven care is greater for open surgery than for laparoscopic approaches. Registration number: CRD42015017850 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ) Abstract : Protocols improve outcomes … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 103:Issue 13(2016)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 103:Issue 13(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 103, Issue 13 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 103
- Issue:
- 13
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0103-0013-0000
- Page Start:
- 1783
- Page End:
- 1794
- Publication Date:
- 2016-10-20
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.10306 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8322.xml