Looking for sufficient change: Evaluation of counsellor training for STI syndromic management in India. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vaz, Melita; Kadyan, Nisha; Chalil, Sumitha; Prasad, Turlapati L.N.; Singh, Aman Kumar
• Is Part Of: Evaluation and program planning. Volume 58(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 141
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Counsellor training -- Training evaluation -- Competency assessment -- STI syndromic management; Health planning -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; 362.1068
• DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0149-7189

Abstract

Highlights: Training counsellors for patient education related to syndromic management of STI has not been discussed in the literature before. National programme managers in India developed a competency-based approach to train a newly-constituted workforce. Conventional training had not demonstrated good results. Using this approach, they were able to improve the training process for counsellors and demonstrate improved change. Abstract: In India, public health care of Sexually Transmitted Infections is delivered through Designated STI/RTI Clinics (DSRCs) using syndromic management. This paper describes efforts, over three years, to improve in-service training for counsellors positioned at DSRCs—using a data approach. The programme managers realised, through rigorous monitoring of initial induction training reports that, while knowledge and attitudes of most trainees had improved as evident from t -tests, at least one-quarter scored worse on post-training assessments (n = 859). Therefore, they undertook a survey using a competency approach to diagnose what critical competencies are influenced through training: counselling skills, risk reduction suggestions, labelling male and female anatomy, record-keeping and STI patient education (n = 132). Survey results demonstrated that trainees failed to pass a two-thirds cutoff score in most competencies. These findings led the programme managers to modify training and implement tighter quality measures. In the second round of training – refresher training – outcomes on competency assessments before and after training showed more acceptable performance (n = 833). The paper describes how programme managers, after an acceptance of such initial short-comings, developed customized assessments when literature provided limited guidance and how they worked to achieve change that was acceptable for programme needs.